Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Most Valuable Kits in Europe - Premier League Killing It

Posted on 8/19/15 at 2:27 pm
Posted by mynamebowl
Houston
Member since Jun 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 2:27 pm
Link

This post was edited on 8/19/15 at 2:53 pm
Posted by AmericanHoop
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
745 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 9:05 pm to
I'd love to see a top 25 or 50 valuation.
Posted by TheRookbird
Member since Aug 2013
1322 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 9:18 pm to
Kind of crazy. Not in a million years would I guess that Arsenal, Liverpool and Man City all have better kit deals than RM and Barca.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

Man City all have better kit deals than RM and Barca.




from Nike not so much

only bc Etihad pays them way more than anyone else would
This post was edited on 8/19/15 at 11:57 pm
Posted by mynamebowl
Houston
Member since Jun 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 8/20/15 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

only bc Etihad pays them way more than anyone else would


Surely Fly Emirates and Qatar Airways have the cash to at least match the money City got from their joint kit sponsors, regardless of what Adidas/Nike gave RM/Barca. This isn't a list of world's richest clubs after all, just kit sponsorship deals.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45352 posts
Posted on 8/20/15 at 12:30 pm to
Remember Barca pays UNICEF to have them on the back of their kit. They could cash in more if they so wanted.
This post was edited on 8/20/15 at 12:32 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 8/20/15 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Surely Fly Emirates and Qatar Airways have the cash to at least match the money City got from their joint kit sponsors, regardless of what Adidas/Nike gave RM/Barca. This isn't a list of world's richest clubs after all, just kit sponsorship deals.



yes but I don't think you are tracking what im saying

The difference in what Nike pays City and how much Etihad is huge. 12 million a year and 40 million a year about to go to 80 million a year. No one else will pay that much the sponsor City so they got a company with ties to their owner.

You have to take the City numbers with a grain of salt.
This post was edited on 8/20/15 at 1:23 pm
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45352 posts
Posted on 8/20/15 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

You have to take the City numbers with a grain of salt.


I mean why? You get so butthurt about City and where the money comes from. It's there and everyone has to deal with it. It isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 8/20/15 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

I mean why? You get so butthurt about City and where the money comes from


Alot of people do bc its basically self sponsoring themselves to get around FFP.

The Etihad deal is way more than any independent company would pay.


quote:

It's there and everyone has to deal with it. It isn't going anywhere anytime soon.


Well no shite but no denying it isn't shady, City has done a few things in the lets get around FFP department.

The fact Nike only pays them 12 million shows the real market value of the City brand.
This post was edited on 8/20/15 at 3:35 pm
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45352 posts
Posted on 8/20/15 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Alot of people do bc its basically self sponsoring themselves to get around FFP. The Etihad deal is way more than any independent company would pay.


Oh man, huge corporations doing shady shite. Who would have thought.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram