- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dortmund apparently insured against no CL revenue
Posted on 4/23/15 at 4:36 pm to St Augustine
Posted on 4/23/15 at 4:36 pm to St Augustine
quote:
Dortmund is paying closer to 30 percent of the amount insured, one of the people said.
Seems like a steep rate.
0
Posted on 4/23/15 at 5:00 pm to STLhog
I don't really see your point. Chelsea isnt struggling to fill up the Bridge at all. I don't think there would be an issue if the Bridge was larger either.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 5:48 pm to KneffLSU
Your irrelevant point and weak attempt at a jasb aside Chelsea is actively going to great lengths to try and expand searing capacity and shares a city with about a dozen other professional clubs.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:36 pm to RandySavage
Who in their right mind would underwrite this? Even if the agreement was made three years ago, wouldn't they include a clause to void the payout if Dortmund sold their best players?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News