- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Y'all know damn well the intent of the 14thA wasn't for anchor babies
Posted on 10/31/18 at 2:09 pm to FalseProphet
Posted on 10/31/18 at 2:09 pm to FalseProphet
quote:
So you’re saying no one intended this result? Should have spelled that out a little more clearly.
The problem is that when some of these laws were written, it was not humanly possible to project every possible scenario of what could happen. I think some of it was written with an element of common sense invoked within the wording but apparently common sense was wrongly assumed to be a staple of life through the years...
0
Posted on 10/31/18 at 2:11 pm to SleauxPlay
quote:
with a nuanced eye toward "intent."
Confused. Why wouldn't they? Looking at intent isn't the same as rewriting or disregarding the text.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 2:14 pm to bamarep
wouldn't waving a flag of said other foreign country of origin while trying to inter this country proof of such allegiance?
Posted on 10/31/18 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
well yeah because they didn't have immigration laws at that time. want to go back there, too, in order to make it all consistent?
I would be perfectly fine with that if we did away with the social safety nets.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News