- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ: Without limits placed on testimony, the jurors can now learn why the case was faulty
Posted on 6/4/24 at 7:59 am to Sofaking2
Posted on 6/4/24 at 7:59 am to Sofaking2
quote:Kinda like the NY State legislature changing statute of limitations laws for 1 year, and 1 year only, regarding sexual harassments civil suits.
This prosecution marked a first time in history. This whole trial was curated for 1 man. Nobody else would ever be prosecuted.
Only one lawsuit was brought - E. Jean Carroll vs. DJT.
0
Posted on 6/4/24 at 8:28 am to texridder
quote:
it is because Trump denied that it even happened.
She also denied it.
Why are we back to caring about what happens in the bedroom?
Posted on 6/4/24 at 8:39 am to texridder
quote:muh ellipses
texridder
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:49 am to TerryDawg03
Its very difficult for the average human to pivot and admit when they were wrong. In this case, I doubt they would care.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 11:12 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
thought Trump didn't testify. When did he testify that the act never happened?
Posted on 6/4/24 at 11:19 am to imjustafatkid
quote:Trump's lawyers filed a pre-trial Motion In Limine seeking to preclude Daniels from testifying, claiming that her testimony would be "irrelevant and untrue".
I thought Trump didn't testify. When did he testify that the act never happened?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News