- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
'Witness Reciprocity' is a bad idea. Trump should have NO limit to number of witnesses.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:26 pm
'Witness Reciprocity' would limit the number of defense witnesses to the number the Dems call. Trump should have no limits whatsoever as to number of his witnesses.
4
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:50 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
Well it’s a good idea if you’re trying to save face because you realize your charade is about to collapse and expose you for being a bunch of cry babies
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:09 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
i think its framed wrong
what they are talking about is the ability to call witnesses not a 1 for 1 back and forth deal
if dimms call 3 witnesses the repubs cal call 12 or 13 if they want
its just about opening that door of do you rule on what the house passed or do you open it all up and start calling new or old witnesses
what they are talking about is the ability to call witnesses not a 1 for 1 back and forth deal
if dimms call 3 witnesses the repubs cal call 12 or 13 if they want
its just about opening that door of do you rule on what the house passed or do you open it all up and start calling new or old witnesses
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:31 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:100%!
Trump should have NO limit to number of witnesses.
If Dems open that Pandora's Box, it should no-holds-barred in terms of who the Defense can call.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 3:03 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Witness Reciprocity' would limit the number of defense witnesses to the number the Dems call.
This is third world, kangaroo court bullshite. The accused should have every right to a complete defense.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 3:35 pm to MarinaTigerEsq
quote:
This is third world, kangaroo court bullshite. The accused should have every right to a complete defense.
How about an impartial jury while we're at it right?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 3:47 pm to Reytigre
quote:
How about an impartial jury while we're at it right?
The audience of the American public and world serve as somewhat of a check on partisan proceedings. The value of this check is greatly diminished if the accused is not able to mount a full defense.
ETA: when I saw your post, I thought you were genuinely concerned about having a fair hearing. I looked at your post history and now realize you’re a partisan hack. How can you make an argument the accused shouldn’t have a full defense? You do realize it may take more than one witness to rebut all aspects of a prosecution witness’s testimony, right?
Honestly, I try to be civil, but if you don’t believe in the rights of the accused, you really suck, fundamentally and thoroughly.
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 5:24 pm to Reytigre
quote:
How about an impartial jury while we're at it right?
The real jury will vote in November...this shite show pretty much guarantees the outcome.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News