- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: With Kanye doing his thing, board’s thoughts on Diamond and Silk?
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:33 am to Pecker
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:33 am to Pecker
quote:
It seems contrived. It rubs me the wrong way. I don't support Sowell because he is black, I support him because I like his ideas. I don't think the same is true for these women is what I'm getting at. It's patronizing.
These women rail against the establishment, against the DNC poverty pimps, against illegal immigration... if you agree with those premises, but you don't like them saying it, then....
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:33 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Not nearly as bad
That must make it good then.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:35 am to narddogg81
quote:
I bet you have a great grasp of issues
I'm no Diamond or Silk. Maybe one day.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:36 am to Pecker
quote:
It seems contrived.
Why? No more contrived or over the top with the humor than, say, Steven Crowder
quote:
It rubs me the wrong way.
Personal problem
quote:
I don't support Sowell because he is black, I support him because I like his ideas.
Same reason most support D&S
quote:
I don't think the same is true for these women is what I'm getting at. It's patronizing.
I think you're way off base here. They're being themselves and they happen to be black/right wing. That's it. You don't have to like their schtick, but your reasoning is pretty tepid.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:37 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Obviously the same as my thoughts on Jason Whitlock, Kevin Sumlin, my Dad, Michelle Obama, BlackHelicopterPilot, Donald Glover, and Darius Rucker.
Since we're just lumping random black people together now.
Hahahahaha amazing.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:39 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
I think you're way off base here. They're being themselves and they happen to be black/right wing. That's it. You don't have to like their schtick, but your reasoning is pretty tepid.
Maybe. I think people are looking for black (or female) mascots and will take what they can get. I find it patronizing. That's just me.
They're free to be themselves but I don't find them particularly interesting or thoughtful. In the same way that I wasn't impressed by Tomi Lahren.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:39 am to Pecker
quote:
That must make it good then.
I said or implied nothing of the kind, and you know it
Goddamn that was lazy on your part
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:39 am to FT
quote:
I won’t comment at all for a while, if this thread takes off.
Get a job, hippie.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:40 am to cokebottleag
quote:
How are the two connected again? They don't even have the same audience.
Liberals are racist. Duh.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:41 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
I said or implied nothing of the kind, and you know it
Goddamn that was lazy on your part
You made a really loose statement. I replied with an equally loose statement.
This post was edited on 5/17/18 at 11:42 am
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:42 am to Pecker
quote:
I think people are looking for black (or female) mascots and will take what they can get. I find it patronizing. That's just me.
You're reaching. Maybe some want that, but most just agree with what they say. Like what propels most of these personalities.
It'd be patronizing if they were saying people should support them because they're black or female. That's not what's happening here.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:43 am to Pecker
quote:
I find it patronizing.
That's the second time you said that. Your virtue has been signaled. I doubt Diamond and Silk could give a flying frick how you feel about their situation.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:43 am to Pecker
quote:
You made a really loose statement. I replied with an equally loose statement.
Nope. Mischaracterization on your part.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:44 am to Pecker
quote:
You made a really loose statement.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:44 am to Pecker
quote:
Maybe. I think people are looking for black (or female) mascots and will take what they can get. I find it patronizing.
You are projecting your racism. Black women with opinions must just be schtick. How racist is that.
This post was edited on 5/17/18 at 11:45 am
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:45 am to FT
we love them !!!!...they are gold
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:45 am to Kcrad
quote:
That's the second time you said that.
Yeah it's his go-to. Funny, I don't feel patronized by them at all.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:47 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
It'd be patronizing if they were saying people should support them because they're black or female. That's not what's happening here.
uh... why do you think people support them? People on the right badly want black people to spout something they agree with. Even if those people sometimes say dumb stuff and act like clowns.
I have this weird approach that might sound racist but hear me out: I don't care what color someone is; I care about what they say and how they act.
I don't find them to be impressive or insightful.
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:47 am to FT
Please anchor this stupid, self serving thread.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News