- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:09 pm to Eurocat
quote:
which explains that since September 2015 the agency has automatically stopped benefit payments when anyone reaches the age of 115.
Why not just stop paying benefits when they die?
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:43 pm to lsuconnman
But then the system should show these are survivor's benefits, not payments to people who are long dead.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:49 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
GAAP accounting has nothing to do with this. What we have here is a failure, or absence, of basic internal controls on computer systems.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:28 pm to wareagle7298
quote:
I have a friend that has spent his whole career doing COBOL programming for IBM. He makes really, really good money because no one under the age of 50 is going to take the time to learn it, and he is the last of a dying bread.
Here's my hot take.
With the rise of AI COBOL is easier to maintain now than prior to AI with old code developers.
Feed the COBOL code into a trained model and let it tell you what the code does and then ask it for changes. A human can then verify.
Popular
Back to top


0




