- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:19 pm to boosiebadazz
Let's just call a spade a spade here. You're trying to say that all of these 20 however million illegals should be granted amnesty.
Won't happen.
Won't happen.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:38 pm to AlterEd
That’s pretty ching chong potato-ey, even for you.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:41 pm to the808bass
quote:
They had no idea how dumb lawyers would get.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:42 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That’s pretty ching chong potato-ey, even for you.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
They had no idea how dumb lawyers would get
True. The dumbest posters on here claim to be Lawyers
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:45 pm to SDVTiger
Only because no one would believe we’re smart enough to be realtors or hock mortgages
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:45 pm to SDVTiger
Followed closely by the resident "doctors." Funny how some of these doctors and lawyers spend crazy amounts of time on the internet instead of working with, you know, clients.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Was it happening four years ago?
Prosecutorial overreach? Did you sleep thru what they tried to do to Trump?
Hell, Fanni Willis, Leticia James, and your boy Jack Smith were having meetings in the White House.
And yet, Merrick & Co. still couldnt take Trump out. I'm sure you were disappointed that they couldn't pave the way for Nikki Haley to win the GOP nomination. That way, an Establishment crook would've won no matter what, and you would've been happy.
But alas, they just couldn't touch OMB. I'm sure you were sad about that.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:53 pm to boosiebadazz
You should know the reason, counsel. If you don’t, I find that scary.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:54 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Only because no one would believe we’re smart enough to be realtors or hock mortgages
You are just proving me right with how dumb you are
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:08 pm to boosiebadazz
goes back to the Magna Carta
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:13 pm to prplhze2000
This is correct. The King had suspended grand juries in the colonies and required colonists to be tried in England in criminal matters. The Constitution notably does not require indictments by grand jury in all cases.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:48 pm to boosiebadazz
This is a dumb gotcha attempt after watching lawfare for the past decade. The intent of the Founders matters little when the system has been corrupted from its foundations.
We literally saw a black judge cut an unrepentant rapist's sentence in half, even after he cussed at and threatened her in court, just because he is black. And you expect me to revere a system where that is allowed to happen? All the blame is on you lawyers for the lack of trust.
You put money and power over the constitution but now try to play on our emotional attachment to the constitution and the Founding Fathers to cover for the corrupt system you created. We're not falling for it.
We literally saw a black judge cut an unrepentant rapist's sentence in half, even after he cussed at and threatened her in court, just because he is black. And you expect me to revere a system where that is allowed to happen? All the blame is on you lawyers for the lack of trust.
You put money and power over the constitution but now try to play on our emotional attachment to the constitution and the Founding Fathers to cover for the corrupt system you created. We're not falling for it.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:29 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Why did the Founders explicitly write Grand Juries into the Fifth Amendment?
Because they didn't anticipate encouraging lawlessness based on party affiliation alone.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 12:18 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News