re: Which one of you is this?

Give me something to debate and I’ll debate it. And you damn right, I’m “schooling people”. Shall I continue schooling you? You don’t know a damn thing about EOs and the ones I’m talking about had absolutely nothing to do with the meme coof and I referenced ones long since amended prior to then you couldn’t even respond to weeks ago!!!

LINK

quote:

---

No way devolution could take place for a year and six months much less missing the mandated public disclosure.

---

So you've said. Repeatedly.

quote:

---

Read this from the beginning to the end to clearly see how you are being duped. (It is Newsweek a very left leaning trash hole) But it is a investigative military reporter.

-NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE-Exclusive: Inside The Military's Top Secret Plans If Coronavirus Cripples the Government

---

Considering that I've linked that Newsweek article no less than 3 times in reference to the topic, you're late to the party if you believe you're bringing some epic boom to support your evidence.

quote:

---

Patel Patriot is probably a fed because he copied off this paper, read it above^^^ (It cites devolution) for his twisted out of context, fan fiction.

---

It's been a number of months since I've read Part 1 of PP's series but even after all this time, I can tell you he openly states that the Newsweek article was the genesis of his research. Not quite sure what you think you're accomplishing by calling him a fed.

I've said all along that if the situation he outlines is in fact what's been going on, and his theory is in play (No, we don't have absolute proof, that's why it's referred to as the 'Devolution THEORY'), that I could see his being breadcrumbed by the good guys all along to ease folks into the concept.

I get it that you love painting me as some arrogant prick who has insider knowledge but if that were my goal, I'd be failing miserably, since I wholeheartedly encourage folks who have questions about why otherwise inexplicable things are happening within our government look to the very same material that I've researched to my own satisfaction. Keeping the secret recipe secret hardly does anyone any good.

TSLG created a post linking a video with the express intent of mocking the man in the interview. My challenge to him was that if it's so easily dEbOoNkEd, then explain to us why Trump would completely restructure major sections of the military and enact a continuity of government EO, including specific mentions of devolution in the Federal Mission Resilience Strategy that gets published each 4 years when he was less than 6 weeks from leaving the WH, if there was no plan in place to deal with an illegitimate President being installed.

He was unable to do that and apparently is incapable of understanding the concept. I am neither his concierge nor his secretary, but most importantly, I do not care whether or not this individual wakes up in the morning, much less opens his addled mind to the concept that Trump's final days in office raise more questions than they answer, if the Devolution theory is not in play.

quote:

---

we don't have absolute proof

---

You have no proof; you only have a theory.

Thats what makes it so ridiculous for you to skip around like you've proven it clearly and convincingly.

Go back to your echo chamber where three positive emoticons on your tele post is all the proof you need.

I fully realize the Newsweek article has been discussed in one of the many discussions on this topic. I am not saying it is any gotcha. You don't seem to have any sound discernment of the basic concepts of the devolution theory. You spam links to it and that's that.

I am saying now, that if you read the Newsweek article from beginning to end. LINK (w/o clipping bits and pieces to form a separate narrative of devolution)

It is clear that it is impossible devolution was triggered.

The basic core facts to devolution that trigger devolution-did not happen.

Trump was ready with whatever was needed in directives/orders (if the govt was going to allow the govt to be exposed in justice regarding the takeover of America & biowarfare of the CCP)

Trump put all of his chips on the Supreme Court and he lost to the swamp; and was then set up with J6.

It is over, move on.

quote:

---

Regarding Devolution. There were many directives/orders written. One was a few weeks before Trump took office.

The directives are in place if...

-An entire WH were to get covid (any pandemic/virus)

-A nuclear war

-People are fighting in the streets for food

-An emergency act that leaves no one left in the Presidential cabinet and Congress.

Then Devolution takes place.

*And if devolution were to ever happen it is clearly expressed in the directives and mandated, that the public that are still alive- will be very aware we are in devolution.

No way devolution could take place for a year and six months much less missing the mandated public disclosure.

---

We did not have a nuclear war or a Presidential cabinet all down with covid. The POTUS cabinet/govt has to be incapacitated for devolution to happen. FULL STOP.

The directive is clear that devolution is to be made public. So devolution is again moot, null & void, failing to meet two mandatory triggers.

And no one cares that you don't care if TSLG, myself, or Sam Hill wake up in the morning. Take your emotional arguments off board with Karla please. Thanks.

quote:

---

Her Qualifications May Shock You

---

Now, qualifications matter to you?

We've had salesmans and plumbers constantly telling attorneys they don't know shite about the law for years.

You really do need to step away from it all for at least a few weeks.

quote:

---

Post some facts or ideas to counter that devolution is/was dead in the water.

---

What in the actual frick do you think we've been doing in these threads? Every time we get a legit discussion going about the topic, you and your bizarre, nihilist cult rush in to decry everything presented is "dEbOOnKeD!" and then immediately switch to ad hom attacks on those of us sharing the actual, sourced evidence we feel makes the case.

And we wonder why the threads get anchored.... Y'all can't stay on topic if your miserable, contrarian lives depended on it. I cite page 2 of this thread and the entire Government in Exile thread as proof.

You sing the blues ad nauseum about how the Q Thread was a "safe space" and "dissenting thought wasn't allowed," but did you ever stop to wonder if the reason it got to thousands of pages and hundreds of thousands of posts was because we could actually discuss things without getting derailed by shrieking harpies like yourself?

Of course you didn't. Your narcissism and insatiable urge to be the loudest in the room won't let you ponder anything else.

Pro-tip: "Nuh-UHHHHH!!!" and "This is bullshite because... reasons" are not valid rebuttals. If you could ever charter a tugboat to remove your head from your own arse, you might discover that there's a whole big world out there of things that haven't occurred to you, yet.

I just checked. The last 3 to 4 Q related, PP, anons knew threads were anchored. Good thing for you as you were failing at presenting your obsession of PP.

If you are delusional enough to think the anchors happen because of people daring to question. Go start a Q devolution, anons knew, thread. The Q theme is anchored for a reason.

People post threads/subjects, if you can't back up your claim/thread you get questioned or told GTFO. You aren't special. Tsk Tsk.

From the general news: If anything: Biden will utilize some of these directives to install mandatory mail in ballots. And order the military on the streets.