- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:41 pm to HailToTheChiz
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:41 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
It was already involved in placing limitations.
If you believe this, why are you in favor of more limitations?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:41 pm to Wolfhound45
Since the beginning of time
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:42 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
When did the murder of an innocent, defenseless person become a medical decision?
It didn't. But the decision to terminate a pregnancy did in the 70s (in the legal sense) and much earlier (in the moral sense).
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:45 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It didn't. But the decision to terminate a pregnancy did in the 70s (in the legal sense) and much earlier (in the moral sense).
More lies from Dr. Dumbarse...

Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:45 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's when the fetus is viable, and born.
So long as the mother doesn't mentally go off a murderous cliff and abort the baby the day before her water breaks, right?
If your statement is sincere, then you would be in direct opposition to Planned Parenthood and the majority of your new party.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:46 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
So long as the mother doesn't mentally go off a murderous cliff and abort the baby the day before her water breaks, right?
Yeah, that doesn't happen.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:46 pm to BamaAtl
It’s not about the individual. It’s about another separate individual.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:47 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
If your statement is sincere, then you would be in direct opposition to Planned Parenthood and the majority of your new party.
That’s impossible, she is a slave to her moronic party. Can’t think for herself and she knows it.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:48 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
It’s about another separate individual.
It's not a separate individual. If the mother were to die while pregnant with a 6-week old fetus, what are the chances the fetus survives 10 years?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:50 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's not a separate individual.
Do you understand illustrations better?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:50 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's not a separate individual. If the mother were to die while pregnant with a 6-week old fetus, what are the chances the fetus survives 10 years?
Paging Dr. Dumbarse, Dr. Dumbarse, please come empty the bed pans again
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:51 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
Do you understand illustrations better?
Answer the question. If the mother of a 6-week old fetus were to die tonight, what are the odds that the 'separate individual' would be alive in 10 years?
Go on, it's not a hard question.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:51 pm to BamaAtl
You must love the thought of killing babies, baby killer...
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:55 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Contrats must be agreed to voluntarily.
Which is why I said taxes are part of the social contract.
Obviously
ETA Hollie isht I’m 30 pages behind
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yup.
aborting babies violates the social contract, like any other crime against another person
ok. thread over. i win
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:57 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Contrats must be agreed to voluntarily.
You agree to it every day you use one of America's roads, or electric grid, etc.
You don't like it, I'm sure you can make do in the wilderness all by yourself.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:00 pm to BamaAtl
quote:I did answer your question. Even explained why the premise is false. Unfortunately I can’t understand it for you. Your turn.
So you don't want to answer the question because you know you can't?
quote:Desperate.
At least you admit when you've been beaten
quote:So... you do not claim that one persons need for healthcare is a claim on another person’s wealth. Liar. You’ve assert than numerous times. You’re toast.
It isn't at all.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:01 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I did answer your question
That was 500 posts ago, but I'm pretty sure you never did.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:03 pm to BamaAtl
quote:100% certain I did. I’ll do it again. It is a false equivalence, because autonomy doesn’t apply in the alternative.
That was 500 posts ago, but I'm pretty sure you never did.
It’s a bit like asking: “Is the sky apple?” Ah, you can’t answerl it so you admit it’s orange! Absurdity.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 7:08 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
A non-sapient organism (1st trimester, at least) HAS no “autonomy.” It does not even have basic higher brain function, which does not develop until early in the 3rd trimester.
Amazing! You managed to use such seemingly advanced wording and yet still sound like a dumbass. Sapiency, autonomy, nor basic higher brain function determine the value of human life.
Popular
Back to top


0






