- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What would have to come out for you to say Trump had committed an impeachable offense?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 12:59 am to DeathAndTaxes
Posted on 10/23/19 at 12:59 am to DeathAndTaxes
Asking for an investigation to prevent fraud of billions of dollars should be met with praise, not impeachment.
1
Posted on 10/23/19 at 1:02 am to xGeauxLSUx
quote:
Why don't you wait until after this election when Trump has more flexibility?
Do you realize that Obama was president at the time he said that?
Do you realize the difference that makes?
Obviously not, or you wouldn't spout that ignorant non-sense.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 1:04 am to texridder
quote:
Do you realize that Obama was president at the time he said that?
Do you realize the difference that makes?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 1:15 am to LSU7096
quote:
FCPA is enforced in the business world all the time,
And in this particular case, what foreign official do you say was bribed by whom?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 1:35 am to ShortyRob
quote:
That he wanted them to make up FAKE shite and threatened them that if they didn't do it, he would penalize them using the power of the USG.
He wanted them to prove that the Ukrainians stole the DNC computer data and not the Russians.
That qualifies as making up fake shite.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 1:50 am to ShortyRob
quote:
and plenty of senators have already said that they would not vote to convict.
quote:
More have already said they WOULD But, you knew that.
You're FOS as usual. Link to where it has legitimately been reported that more GOP senators have said they would vote to convict than not.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:03 am to texridder
quote:
You're FOS as usual. Link to where it has legitimately been reported that more GOP senators have said they would vote to convict than not.
quote:
Prominent GOP consultant Mike Murphy claimed on Wednesday that he was told by a Republican senator that the majority of Republican senators "would vote to impeach" President Donald Trump
quote:LINK
"One Republican senator told me if it was a secret vote, 30 Republican senators would vote to impeach Trump," he claimed, suggesting that the GOP lawmakers are concerned that voting against the president could harm them politically. The Senate is currently controlled by Republicans, with 53 GOP lawmakers serving in the legislative body.
Granted, as Murphy's source is almost certainly Sen. Pierre Delecto, one could argue little was legitimate about it.
However, every MSM outlet seems to view Sen. Delecto as the suddenly most "legitimate" GOP source in Congress.
So pick your poison.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:03 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Congress isn't investigating. Democrats are
WRONG.
House committes are investigating - using the same house rules that Nunes' house committee used to conduct the Trump Campaign - Russian collusion investigation.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:10 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Do you realize that Obama was president at the time he said that?
Do you realize the difference that makes?
Obviously you're too s stupid to post any response to that post other than an air-headed emoji.
That's your 27th emoji-only response this month. You're an imbecile.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:13 am to texridder
quote:No, "that qualifies as making up fake shite."
He wanted them to prove that the Ukrainians stole the DNC computer data and not the Russians.
Trump wants Ukraine to fully assess any role it played in the 2016 US election, and any role Ukraine feels the US played in enabling/encouraging those actions.
Regarding your post:
Are you claiming Crowdstrike has no Ukrainian connection and that such connection would not motivate smearing Russia?
Are you insinuating Ukraine did not ACTIVELY INTERFERE in the 2016 election ON BEHALF OF DEMOCRATS?
Are you now saying foreign involvement in US elections, or US corruption in foreign countries is something we should not investigate?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:15 am to DeathAndTaxes
quote:
What would have to come out in regards to the situation with Ukraine for you to say an impeachment proceeding is warranted? And what evidence would you need to see?
Secret witnesses? Secret proceedings? A stone-cold liar running the investigation?
It is the fruit of the poison tree.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:16 am to Tani
quote:
We KNOW that there was no investigation in the Ukraine. There was no investigation because there was no reason for one
Hmmm sounds like the same could be said for the Russia Collusion fantasy. This is the same shite Dems throw against the wall hoping to get rid of Trump because they know they won’t beat him in 2020.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:22 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Trump wants Ukraine to fully assess any role it played in the 2016 US election, and any role Ukraine feels the US played in enabling/encouraging those actions.
Funny thing is that on the phone call he was pointing to the fact that a Ukrainian actually had the DNC server.
Of course that part of the call is broken up by those pesky ellipses.
The rest of that crap you posted is the typical crap that gets posted after Trump says stuff he shouldn't have, and Trump apologists explain what Trump really meant to say.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:24 am to DeathAndTaxes
The only "situation with Ukraine" invokes Joe Biden using the country as a money laundering operation for Dems and his son.
So basically nothing.
Now if he had every Democrat official in the country arrested and throw into a North Korean prison I would be open to looking at the evidence in 2024 or so. It would take that long to vet it, of course.
So basically nothing.
Now if he had every Democrat official in the country arrested and throw into a North Korean prison I would be open to looking at the evidence in 2024 or so. It would take that long to vet it, of course.
This post was edited on 10/23/19 at 2:29 am
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:26 am to ShortyRob
quote:
And, can we just dispense with formalities and you log in with your longer standing profile tex?
Fuk you you ignorant a-hole.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:26 am to ShortyRob
quote:
And, can we just dispense with formalities and you log in with your longer standing profile tex?
Fuk you you ignorant a-hole.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:28 am to texridder
quote:Bizarre.
House committes are investigating - using the same house rules that Nunes' house committee used to conduct the Trump Campaign - Russian collusion investigation.
First off "Committees" are not investigating. The Intel Committee, by itself, independent of the Judiciary Committee, is supposedly conducting "an impeachment inquiry".
Why the Intel Committee?
Why is non-classified material (very different than what Nunes was assessing) being discussed only in a SCIF?
Why are GOP Reps being denied access to testimony/transcripts when out-of-context testimony harmful to the POTUS is leaking to the MSM in torrents?
Nunes was not conducting secret schiff interrogations of matters which should have been publically heard in the Judiciary Committee.
This post was edited on 10/23/19 at 2:41 am
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:33 am to NC_Tigah
quote:A secret vote. You're an imbecile.
One Republican senator told me if it was a secret vote, 30 Republican senators would vote to impeach Trump,"
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:37 am to texridder
quote:Do they?
Funny thing is that on the phone call he was pointing to the fact that a Ukrainian actually had the DNC server.
Do they have a copy? A back-up?
No?
Where did crowdstrike store back-up files when it was doing its work?
quote:So Chalupa and the DNC did not deal with the Ukrainian Embassy in 2016 to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign? Really? Ukraine's judiciary did not find Ukraine did in fact interfere in the 2016 US election? Really?
The rest of that crap you posted is the typical crap that gets posted after Trump says stuff he shouldn't have, and Trump apologists explain what Trump really meant to say.
quote:Perhaps you should reassess.
The rest of that crap you posted
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:40 am to texridder
quote:Secret? Like in a SCIF? Nah, that couldn't happen in an "Impeachment inquiry" could it?
A secret vote. You're an imbecile.
Page 10 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News