2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your personal definition of "globalism" ?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:27 pm to UtahCajun
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:27 pm to UtahCajun
This lunatic seems to think we have the right to intervene in any country that doesn't have a democratically elected leader. This is insane because who decides when we can intervene? The State Department? The CIA? And, like I said, if Biden stole 2020 -- does that mean we are not a sovereign nation and China could kidnap him? Do we have the right to abduct or overthrow Putin if he was installed?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:36 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I would say that yes, we did attack Venezuela's sovereignty
I'll give you even more rope.
Could you attack a nation's sovereignty if the majority of the nation wanted it done?
quote:
This lunatic seems to think we have the right to intervene in any country that doesn't have a democratically elected leader.
Nope.
I just asked how could removing an unelected leader be an attack on a nation's sovereignty.
You and SFPLC need to stop dick jousting and pay attention.
This post was edited on 9/27/26 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:51 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
does that mean we are not a sovereign nation and China could kidnap him?
What if 90-95% of Americans wanted China to do it?
This post was edited on 9/27/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:55 pm to Azkiger
It's a good question and a dangerous one. There is an argument half of our population would have welcomed that.
I feel like people have been fooled by the protests in Iran and think they represent 90% of the population, therefore our bombing is justified. But, what if only 5-10% of the population support the protestors? The bottom line is I don't think we should be making that call ever. There is no way you would trust an Obama CIA or State Dept on these things.
I feel like people have been fooled by the protests in Iran and think they represent 90% of the population, therefore our bombing is justified. But, what if only 5-10% of the population support the protestors? The bottom line is I don't think we should be making that call ever. There is no way you would trust an Obama CIA or State Dept on these things.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:57 pm to Azkiger
quote:
I'll give you even more rope.
Could you attack a nation's sovereignty if the majority of the nation wanted it done?
You can have your rope back. I answered a question you said wasn't answered.
If you think you can play word games by making an external force somehow a domestic force, you are flawed.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 3:58 pm to Azkiger
quote:
What if 90-95% of Americans wanted China to do it?
Matters not
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:04 pm to Bunk Moreland
~92% of Venezuelans wanted Maduros gone.
Seems like the nation of Venezuela lacked power over itself (sovereignty) since Maduro stole the election.
Seems like the nation of Venezuela lacked power over itself (sovereignty) since Maduro stole the election.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:05 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Matters not
Why not?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:05 pm to Azkiger
Yet we still have a bunch of hardline Chavistas ruling the country with a gun to their head. Weird.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:06 pm to Azkiger
Because we don't have some inherent right to determine every country's internal workings.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:06 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Yet we still have a bunch of hardline Chavistas ruling the country with a gun to their head. Weird.
So 92% of Venezuelans didn't want Maudro gone?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:07 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Because we don't have some inherent right to determine every country's internal workings.
Sure.
But does Venezuela have an inherent right to their own country's internal workings?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:11 pm to Azkiger
quote:
But does Venezuela have an inherent right to their own country's internal workings?
Sounds like you're justifying the Iranian revolution rejecting globalist control in 1979, but trying to do it within the context of the globalist-led coup eroding Iran's sovereignty in 1953
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
By his logic, we can take a poll of every country and if the people don't support their leadership at a certain threshold, that justifies U.S. intervention.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:14 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Yet we still have a bunch of hardline Chavistas ruling the country with a gun to their head. Weird.
Hold on you are for regime change now?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sounds like you're justifying the Iranian revolution rejecting globalist control in 1979, but trying to do it within the context of the globalist-led coup eroding Iran's sovereignty in 1953
I'm just saying framing the removal of a leader of a nation which 92% of its citizens want gone as an attack on their sovereignty is main stream media levels of dishonesty.
This is exactly why you've been very cautious with how you try and disagree with me.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:16 pm to SDVTiger
I give credit to the administration for not trying to install the globalist puppet lady. BUT, it kind of shows that we don't care if we country is run by tyrants. We just want those tyrants to be allied with us.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:16 pm to Azkiger
quote:
This is exactly why you've been very cautious with how you try and disagree with me.
You lost that discussion and then raged.
I didn't need caution. Being right from the outset was all I needed.
You're now pivoting from fake elections to popular support. I'm curious to see what the next pivot will be.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
By his logic, we can take a poll of every country and if the people don't support their leadership at a certain threshold, that justifies U.S. intervention.
Nope.
My stance is only doing so shouldn't be labeled as "attack on their sovereignty" (your limp wristed take on the matter).
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:18 pm to Azkiger
quote:
My stance is only doing so shouldn't be labeled as "attack on their sovereignty"
What is the direct relationship between opinion polls of a state's population and the sovereignty of that state, as a general concept?
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News