Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

What is the Supreme Court’s shadow docket?

Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:59 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42475 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:59 am
quote:

The birth of the Supreme Court’s shadow docket has long been a mystery. ?


quote:

the shadow papers The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court Secret memos obtained by The New York Times illuminate the origins of the court’s now-routine “shadow docket” rulings on presidential power.

Just after 6 p.m. on a February evening in 2016, the Supreme Court issued a cryptic, one paragraph ruling that sent both climate policy and the court itself spinning in new directions.

For two centuries, the court had generally handled major cases at a stately pace that encouraged care and deliberation, relying on written briefs, oral arguments and in-person discussions. The justices composed detailed opinions that explained their thinking to the public and rendered judgment only after other courts had weighed in.

But this time, the justices were sprinting to block a major presidential initiative. By a 5-to-4 vote along partisan lines, the order halted President Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan, his signature environmental policy. They acted before any other court had addressed the plan’s lawfulness. The decision consisted of only legal boilerplate, without a word of reasoning.

At the time, the ruling seemed like a curious one-off. But that single paragraph turned out to be a sharp and lasting break. That night marks the birth, many legal experts believe, of the court’s modern “shadow docket,” the secretive track that the Supreme Court has since used to make many major decisions, including granting President Trump more than 20 key victories on issues from immigration to agency power.

Since that night a decade ago, the logic behind the Supreme Court’s pivotal 2016 order has remained a mystery. Why did a majority of the justices bypass time-tested procedures and opt for a new way of doing business?

The answer would remain secret for generations, legal experts predicted. “We’ll never know (at least, until our grandkids can read the justices’ internal papers from that time period),” Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown, wrote in a newsletter in February marking the anniversary of the order.


https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/us/politics/supreme-court-shadow-docket.html?unlocked_article_code=1.b1A.bg3w.i_FWT2lsCQj6&smid=url-share
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167605 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 12:49 pm to
Not sure really but it didn't require a rocket scientist to see....

Quite possibly anything Obama wanted regarding climate change and energy and carbon credits.. Had no basis on any scientific proof.

Being that Chief Justice Roberts already screwed us all over with Obamacare ...Maybe he wasn't ready to just give carte blanche to the Black Jesus.... Regarding a faulty religion called climate change?

Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4723 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 1:14 pm to
Wall Street/JPM wasn't ready to hand everything over to the EU Globalists...
Wall street/JPM doesn't like being hollowed out by Europe.

So, they pulled strings to make sure the Supreme Court actually checked some of Obamas pushes for more power.

Same thing they have done to Trump from time to time.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42475 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 1:16 pm to
Does Roberts control this?
Posted by justsaygeaux2
Member since Feb 2017
2419 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Not sure really but it didn't require a rocket scientist to see....

Quite possibly anything Obama wanted regarding climate change and energy and carbon credits.. Had no basis on any scientific proof.

Being that Chief Justice Roberts already screwed us all over with Obamacare ...Maybe he wasn't ready to just give carte blanche to the Black Jesus.... Regarding a faulty religion called climate change?


Notice there is no mention of the concept of original jurisdiction where SCOTUS is strangely acting outside of the realm of their constitutional powers. It's curious because who would grant cert in a separation of powers claim where SCOTUS could be seen as a party simply by addressing the case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram