re: What is CISA And Why Should We Care?

quote:

---

I’m sure SloMo will tell us that any discussion of the fundamentally corrupted nature of our nation’s alphabet intelligence agencies are “irrelevant” to the current discussion.

---

No. Nice combination of a Strawman AND diversion, though.

quote:

---

After his half-@ssed showing in this thread, I’m slowly coming to the conclusion that SloMo is a disingenuous retard!

---

You obviously haven't read my last post in this thread.

I can't wait for you to move the goalposts in response.

No crawfishing. You're avoiding looking like the idiot you are. I'll re-post since you avoided it once already:

quote:

---

Do you actually think simply highlighting the word “Infrastructure” in bold demonstrates that this bill granted CISA — an agency ostensibly created to protect cybersecurity — the authority to lock down major sectors of the economy in the event of a pandemic?

---

Where did I say that they had that authority? They don't.

Tell me where they exercised that authority.

quote:

---

What type of lawyer are you?

---

One who can read. A skill you apparently lack.

quote:

---

There is nothing in the bill that remotely comes close to granting CISA the power it has acquired.

---

What specific powers are you referencing?

All CISA did was issue recommendations. It didn't order anything.

I already quoted this, but I'll quote it again:

quote:

---

Further: “This guidance is not binding and is primarily a decision support construct to assist state and local officials. It should not be confused as official executive action by the United States Government.”

---

Do I need to break it down even more simply for you to finally comprehend this basic concept?

Bump

quote:

---

You are actively avoiding questions:

---

All my work here is done and shown above in my first reply to you: this entire narrative about determining “essential workers” during the pandemic originated with CISA’s directives on determining a hierarchy of critical infrastructure. Yet there was nothing in the original bill that gave CISA oversight in such an eventuality: Drop Mic, End Of Story.

You now are doing the very thing you accuse me of doing: moving the goalposts into a discussion over CISA’s benign “recommendations.” This is the same tactic Fauci used when he said he said only made “recommendations” when in fact these “recommendations” were adopted into official policies by our nation’s public health industrial complex.

It is no surprise and indeed utterly predictable that you are simply regurgitating Fauci’s arguments on this matter — and again, doing exactly what you accuse me of doing! To further engage your dissembling on this matter — or any matter as far as that goes — is an exercise in complete futility:

quote:

---

All my work here is done and shown above in my first reply to you

---

But it's not.

This was your reply:

quote:

---

You direct me to the specific language in the bill — ostensibly passed to protect against cybersecurity terror threats — which enables CISA to declare a state of de facto martial law over the entire economy because of a supposed naturally occurring biological contagion?

---

Nothing gives it that power BUT it never had/used that power. That's why I asked you specific questions.

You seem VERY confused as to what actually happened and what CISA actually did.

quote:

---

: this entire narrative about determining “essential workers” during the pandemic originated with CISA’s directives

---

What directives?

They issued guidance, not a directive. They specifically stated it wasn't a federal edict:

quote:

---

“This guidance is not binding and is primarily a decision support construct to assist state and local officials. It should not be confused as official executive action by the United States Government.”

---

quote:

---

You now are doing the very thing you accuse me of doing: moving the goalposts into a discussion over CISA’s benign “recommendations.”

---

Because that's all that happened.

Your fantasy allegations are not reality.

quote:

---

This is the same tactic Fauci used when he said he said only made “recommendations” when in fact these “recommendations” were adopted into official policies by our nation’s public health industrial complex.

---

What specific actions did CISA take to mandate anything?

quote:

---

By all means, keep replying: it tickles me to no end to see this thread returned to the top of the page!

---

I will continue to make you look like the idiot you are as much as you permit.

quote:

---

This clown operates under the impression that his very subjective interpretation of what words or phrases mean — such as “Globalism” being a meaningless term — has some comport with objective reality. It does not.

---

Again, you're an idiot

I ask for definitions of concepts like "globalism" to specifically remove as much subjectivity from malleable terms, to prevent people like you from moving goalposts during arguments because you lack the intellectual capability to do anything other than copy and paste articles you don't understand, without the intelligence to even understand why you are wrong.

This thread is a perfect example.

You are arguing CISA has authority it does not, and acted in a way that it did not, and you refuse any sort of defense of your allegations even when broken down for a child to comprehend.

quote:

---

NOW it's officially a party

---

Since 1828.

quote:

---

Case in point: you are playing semantics

---

THERE IS THE GOALPOST MOVE

quote:

---

CISA’s “guidance” became the de facto standing policy of the nation’s entire public health apparatus when it came to locking down the economy.

---

My work here is done.



So you didn't do any research, didn't know what you were talking about, and are now trying to move the goalpost about all this "authority" that CISA had really wasn't authority.



By the way, the law mandates they create these exact reports-guidance, so you clearly didn't read the actual law.

They don't have the authority you were talking about, but they never used any authority.

You even asked where in the law they had this authority, like a fricking dumbass.

I can cite you in the law where they are mandated to create guidance. I already did it in this thread, but at that point you didn't realize how fricking dumb your "argument" was and kept going, and I even predicted you would move the goalposts, which you did.

Take
The
L