- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:17 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
And you're wrong about everything you've directed towards me.
Every single one of your posts is “nuh uh”. Very compelling. This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:19 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You’re really good at arguing completely irrelevant issues and ignore the overall point. We all know why.
The guy mentioned competitors to Twitter. I give him stats on competitors to Twitter and you bring up one of the most uncompetitive entities on the market as a defense. But I'm the moron.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:22 pm to SlimTigerSlap
You think Facebook is twitters competitor?
It’s nowhere near X, but its estimated value is over $500MM. Not bad for a company that isn’t very old, don’t you think?
quote:
one of the most uncompetitive entities
It’s nowhere near X, but its estimated value is over $500MM. Not bad for a company that isn’t very old, don’t you think?
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:31 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
If i paid over sticker price for my Porsche because I really really wanted it, who the frick cares what a fake lawyer on the internet thinks about the value of my purchase.
That's different from the point being made. Also, when you overpay, you're above market with the clear implication that it could have been had for less.
quote:
He is the wealthiest man alive and you are so fricking arrogant that you mock his acumen with money. It is amazing to watch.
It's not arrogance to objectively look at a business deal and note that he signed a bad contract that had him locked in (correct). And that he overpaid (correct). Clearly, you think if someone has more money than you, they are above reproach...what a bitch arse attitude.
quote:
There is only one entity that will ever care about the value of Twitter again. I’ve told you what that entity is, but you call it irrelevant.
You're brain's boundary is the niche of law you supposedly practice. There are a lot of people and entities that care about the value of Twitter - the employees, the banks (lenders), bond holders, his fellow equity holders. Your lack of actual business experience always shines through. It's not amazing to watch - it's known and expected. If you ever had an honest post, that would be amazing.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:34 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
It’s nowhere near X, but its estimated value is over $500MM. Not bad for a company that isn’t very old, don’t you think?
Jesus.
Moving on.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:36 pm to cwill
quote:
It's not arrogance to objectively look at a business deal and note that he signed a bad contract that had him locked in (correct). And that he overpaid (correct). Clearly, you think if someone has more money than you, they are above reproach...what a bitch arse attitude.
Especially considering he admitted to making a bad deal and actively attempted to get out of it.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:42 pm to cwill
quote:
Your lack of actual business experience always shines through. It's not amazing to watch - it's known and expected. If you ever had an honest post, that would be amazing.
Of the two of us, one has started a company from scratch and sold it. Your consistent incorrect assumptions make me laugh.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:46 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Of the two of us, one has started a company from scratch and sold it.
Tell us about the business.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:50 pm to cwill
quote:
Tell us about the business.
Commercial janitorial. Was a fantastic venture. I highly recommend. Profitable in month one. Staffing was the only headache. Tons of turnover.
Have a much more fun project I just started, but this convo feels a little doxxy, so I’ll wait before filling you in on that one.
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:51 pm to LSUvet72
quote:In fairness, he has threatened a lot of lawsuits and not gone through with them.
Elon means what he says most of the time
Hopefully he does on this one.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:52 pm to cwill
quote:
Tell us about the business.
Trump secured $1 billion in private funding for Truth Social, and the guy believes the company being worth half that amount now is "not bad."
I would not be surprised if he sold his company for a lost and then went out to drink in celebration.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:53 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Trump secured $1 billion in private funding for Truth Social, and the guy believes the company being worth half that amount now is "not bad."
How long did it take the companies on your list of “Twitter competitors” to make a profit?
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:55 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
I would not be surprised if he sold his company for a lost
I think you meant “loss”, and how could a company started from scratch be sold for a loss?. I had zero investors. Just started the company. Literally almost zero overhead. Only incurred expenses when clients were secured. You should try starting your own company one day. Much more fulfilling than making fun of the wealthiest man on earth for his financial acumen.
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:56 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
How long did it take the companies on your list of “Twitter competitors” to make a profit?
I don't know. I never fellated them on the way up.
quote:
and how could a company started from scratch be sold for a loss?
genius
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 11/20/23 at 3:57 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
I don't know. I never fellated them on the way up.
that’s what I thought. Posted on 11/20/23 at 4:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Commercial janitorial. Was a fantastic venture. I highly recommend. Profitable in month one. Staffing was the only headache. Tons of turnover.
Hey congrats on starting a janitor business, but dude, c'mon.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 4:21 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
how could a company started from scratch be sold for a loss?.
Are you serious?
Posted on 11/20/23 at 4:39 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
quote:
one of the most uncompetitive entities
It’s nowhere near X, but its estimated value is over $500MM. Not bad for a company that isn’t very old, don’t you think?
The merger with the SPAC hasn't closed and was extended another year in September. DWAC sounds like a clown show.
But, specifically, all we have on the value of Truth Social:
quote:
$5 to $25 million. That is the estimated value of TMTG, according to financial disclosures made by Trump to the Federal Election Commission earlier this year. That is a pretty dramatic decline from the $875 million valuation for the social media company when the SPAC merger with DWAC was first announced.
LINK
Posted on 11/20/23 at 4:59 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Filing it anywhere else would be pointless.
What am I missing legally, Wednesday?
Media Matters basically conjured a thread using multiple gaslight accounts.
MM employees in fake accounts used neutral or left leaning text-based posts which were bot recognized as ad acceptable. They used only jpeg's, no text, to convey the pro-Hitler, antisemitic content ... i.e., much more difficult in terms of bot recognition.
Once the ads populated, Media Matters edited and/or deleted (curated) non-Nazi content, took screen grabs of IBM Ads in a "Hitler Thread," and wrote articles berating IBM for buying the X ad space.
The kicker?
In several instances the sole viewer of the ad juxtaposition was the Media Matters hitpiece author. Not a single other human saw it.
It sounds like MM then pressured, extorted IBM to abandon X-ads. It did the same with several other companies. At the same time, MM aggressively pressured media-houses to cover the story. So when Musk justifiably called out the ADL as anti-white and racist, IBM finally caved. The dam broke. US media lurched into the story, and the other X-sponsoring companies withdrew in kind.
That is targeted corporate sabotage on a whole new paradigm from the DVS v Fox accusations.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News