Started By
Message

re: Vermont House passes a staggering abortion bill

Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:19 am to
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6073 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:19 am to
They have done this with the constant feuding with President Trump. This issue will be the cherry on the top for them. SCOTUS just voted down the Louisiana case and that was a surprise to a lot of people except Dems you would have thought it was up held the way they are acting.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3979 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

I'm not a staunch pro-lifer, but what exactly would you call a baby 1 day before birth?

Buckeye: I'd call it what it is, not what it isn't because I rely on emotion to make my points.


quote:

Well?

Buckeye: If you need me to answer that, you aren't qualified to participate in this discussion. I recommend your local community college


God damn you’re a douchebag

Go back to porking your fat wife old man

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:29 am to
quote:

He has posted ZERO facts, zero opinions


bullshite.

The groupthink here doesn't make you correct, or safe from ridicule.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:30 am to
quote:

So you'll be fine with the SC overturning Roe v Wade?


Sure. I think it would be bullshite, but if that's the way it goes, then that's the way it goes.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I wish that that you were closer to Longboat Key.


I don't. Tampa is trashy. I do go there for client visits. Maybe someday you'll get to show me how badass you aren't.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Than have somewhere around a 40% suicide rate regardless of whether they have trans surgery of not so yes, they are crazy!

They are 10 times more likely to kill themselves than the general population.


If you feel like backing those assumptions up with data I can destroy, feel free to bring it in.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:38 am to
I do not understand why abortion is such an issue for the pro choice people.

I do not understand why the protections of government do not apply to the babies in the womb.

I do not understand how far the privacy rights of the mother are suppose to go. Does she have the right to kill a 5 year old for example?

I do not understand why we do not have easier adoption laws and more privacy for families wishing to adopt. It is crazy to say a mother has the rights to overturn an adoption for whatever period they do in some states and then say she has the right to kill the baby in the womb.

This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 10:40 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:46 am to
quote:

I do not understand


This is a good first step. Quite a few others in here should follow your example.

quote:

pro choice


Pro-choice and pro-life are stupid, emotional terms.

quote:

I do not understand why the protections of government do not apply to the babies in the womb.


Sometimes, they do.

quote:

I do not understand how far the privacy rights of the mother are suppose to go. Does she have the right to kill a 5 year old for example?


Does a 5 year old still live inside of its mother?

quote:

I do not understand why we do not have easier adoption laws and more privacy for families wishing to adopt.


Too much government. For some reason, y'all want more government.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Sometimes, they do.



Obviously that is about to change in Vermont.

What is it about a woman carrying a baby 9 months that is so bad? Why not let them have it and walk away and make adoption easier?

I certainly am not one to want more government but I absolutely believe the rights of all humans extend to the womb.

It is pretty twisted thinking to want to abort or even to facilitate through elimination of child protection the abortion of a baby that could live outside the womb.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Obviously that is about to change in Vermont.


Sure. I don't live in Vermont. Do you live in Vermont?

quote:

What is it about a woman carrying a baby 9 months that is so bad? Why not let them have it and walk away and make adoption easier?


All pregnant women? Force them to carry a child they don't want?

quote:

I certainly am not one to want more government but I absolutely believe the rights of all humans extend to the womb.


All humans?

quote:

It is pretty twisted thinking to want to abort or even to facilitate through elimination of child protection the abortion of a baby that could live outside the womb.


Yep. I'd never live in Vermont. That doesn't mean I want the federal government to reach further into our lives than they already do.
Posted by OGTiger
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2005
2583 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 11:49 am to
What an intellectual cluster frick this Displacedbuckeye is. Wow! Just Wow!
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 12:08 pm to
Your disagreement is noted.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28158 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Every individual who becomes pregnant
quote:

Such a long way to say woman.


they are actually so forward thinking up there that they are anticipating the advancement in science that will allow anyone who wants to be pregnant the opportunity to kill a kid.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Force them to carry a child they don't want?



If they've been carrying it for more than a couple months? Absolutely. They've waited too long to decide they no longer want to carry a child. They may not want it. They can give it up for adoption. But the decision to carry it has already been made.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

If they've been carrying it for more than a couple months? Absolutely. They've waited too long to decide they no longer want to carry a child. They may not want it. They can give it up for adoption. But the decision to carry it has already been made.


Oh, you must have missed part of my post.

Here you go:

quote:

All pregnant women? Force them to carry a child they don't want?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

"Every individual who becomes pregnant has the fundamental right to choose to carry a pregnancy to term, give birth to a child, or to have an abortion," the bill reads.

It passed by a vote of 106 to 36.


What. The. frick.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
18620 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

What. The. frick.


President Trump's affect on SCOTUS has them frantic to kill as many babies as possible
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Oh, you must have missed part of my post.



No. I read it just fine.

Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

What an intellectual cluster frick this Displacedbuckeye


You could have left out the word "intellectual" and still made your point.

There's no doubt in my mind he is on some serious Meds or is on the Spectrum.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

oogabooga68


Says the dude who created an alter account just to talk shite with different user names.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram