- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: turkey sold 1000s of children mainly survivors of the eq in 1999 to Jeffery Epstein's isla
Posted on 2/3/26 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/3/26 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
No, i am blaming the study itself. I am blaming the psychology dept who did the study. I take issue not with their data of 2% of psychologists handling most of these cases, which i am sure is not accurate anyway. I take issue with their accusation that psychologists are being “shopped” and the results are being manufactured or dreamt up. I take issue with their stated conclusion of the obtained data. I’m not that poor of a communicator and you’re way too smart to misunderstand what i’m saying.
1
Posted on 2/3/26 at 1:08 pm to RandRules
So if I found a study with similar results that wasn't done by someone associated with a psychology department, you'd accept the results?
Posted on 2/3/26 at 1:09 pm to Ailsa
Globalists are Satanist that have a need for many sacrifices. We only hear a few victims come forward. The dead have no voices.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The video was bad, but the fetuses were from normal abortions and not part of some ritualistic/occult Satanic cult.
This is not better.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 5:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What prevents someone from replying to a post made to me?
Nothing.
But when they reply and say what your persona would have said based on the argument you've been making in a long thread in which you have posted a bunch and it's their only post, and there's already a history of you seeming to reply as the persona of this same other poster, it looks funny. Not "funny ha-ha," either.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 5:03 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
This is not better.
The commentary wasn't about being better or worse, just the topic at hand (large-scale, organized occult, ritualistic Satanism )
You don't have to argue normal abortions are good to see the difference in the two
Posted on 2/3/26 at 5:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
It depends on who is doing the testing. As a starting point, those doing the testing should be politically and ideologically neutral in regards to the subject and should not be able to benefit in any way from the results saying one thing or the other. Then, as long as best practices in scientific research are adhered to, i would trust the resulting data. If the data is analyzed and interpretated objectively, I would accept the results. If subjectivity is involved in any part of the process, I don’t consider it a valid test.
I think scientific studies completely absent of p-hacking are rare. Tests are manipulated to validate the ideological beliefs of the tester.
I know I sound like a pessimist but I’m not. I just don’t have much faith in the honesty of people. I am an idealist who lives in reality. I am fully aware that my expectations aren’t reasonable.
I think scientific studies completely absent of p-hacking are rare. Tests are manipulated to validate the ideological beliefs of the tester.
I know I sound like a pessimist but I’m not. I just don’t have much faith in the honesty of people. I am an idealist who lives in reality. I am fully aware that my expectations aren’t reasonable.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News