re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"

quote:

---

Transformation, you say? Then please post any commentary of mine towards the film before commenting on the connection to Q.

---

Do you not know what transformation means?

quote:

---

trans·for·ma·tion
noun
a thorough or dramatic change in form or appearance.

---

So, where was the change after Q was associated with the film?

quote:

---

So, where was the change after Q was associated with the film?

---

There has to be a before and after. What is the "before"?

quote:

---

Hey I thank you for being honest about this when others haven't.

---

You believe it too. Party boys have been a thing for over a century

Minus the satanic panic.

Just dont admit to your "friends"

quote:

---

Rog, do you believe that a cabal of powerful people is transporting children across the world, abusing them in Satanic Ritualistic Abuse?

---

How do you know that it absolutely is not happening?

And how can anyone be right in an argument when it is impossible to know the answer of the subject being argued? Does human trafficking occur? Yes. Have there been ritual human sacrifices in history? Yes. Are there people being trafficked and involved in some type of ritualistic manner? Based on history, most likely. But I can not absolutely say it is happening at this exact moment even though historical evidence says to some degree it likely is. Just as you can not say it absolutely is not happening. And yet, you are saying that.

Or maybe you positively know? Please enlighten us on how you positively know that never in history has a wealthy elite trafficked a child and engaged them in some type of ritualistic manner. And how it is not, at all, happening today.

I mean, there are examples of it scattered all through out history. But I am sure human nature has completely changed in the past 50 years. People today would NEVER do something so twisted and evil. Right?

quote:

---

How do you know that it absolutely is not happening?

---

Can't prove a negative, but lots of actual study went into this after the Satanic Panic. Found no evidence of it on any scale.

quote:

---

And how can anyone be right in an argument when it is impossible to know the answer of the subject being argued?

---

That's why we rely on actual evidence and study and make an analysis of that. Hence why I call SRA "mythology" to differentiate it.

If new evidence comes to light, we can then analyze that in context of the larger analysis.

quote:

---

Are there people being trafficked and involved in some type of ritualistic manner? Based on history, most likely. But I can not absolutely say it is happening at this exact moment even though historical evidence says to some degree it likely is.

---

THAT is fine. Non-controversial.

THAT is not what I'm asking. Some people believe this is happening 100%. Part of that recent amplification was linked to "critical thinker" discussions. There is a literal historical record of this on this site (and even to today b/c it's a popular meme).

quote:

---

Some people believe this is happening 100%.

---

And you are arguing it is 100% not happening. Why are you right? But they are wrong? When no one really knows.

And despite you saying that there is no evidence that there was any actual Satanism back during the Satanic Panic, you need to look into the Pearl High School shooting. Some of those involved in it have testified and stated they absolutely were involved in Satanism. And while it may have not been the primary motive it certainly contributed to the shooting. There are many other real examples of people killing others over “Satanism”. Yet you claim none of that ever happened. But you know otherwise. And you have accused multiple other people in this very thread of being dishonest. Maybe you need to take a break and go find a mirror to look in.

quote:

---

that there was any actual Satanism back during the Satanic Panic,

---

There absolutely was, but it was way overblown.

Most of that came from "recovered memories."

quote:

---

Hes argued it is happening and hes argued it isn't happening.

---

So it’s ok to think it’s happening if everyone denounces Q?

But it has to be a public denouncement made by every poster here?

Then it will be ok to believe it’s happening?

All of this despite the film not mentioning Q in any way? When the
only people associating this film with Q are Leftists and Hollywood
weirdos?


I think I get it now.