- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump's response and he's absolutely correct
Posted on 6/18/20 at 10:44 am to BuckyCheese
Posted on 6/18/20 at 10:44 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
the GOP would be wise
0
Posted on 6/18/20 at 10:48 am to Walkthedawg
More like...
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:26 am to Damone
Actually, the NRA supported the banning of bumpstocks.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:31 am to Reason10
The NRA is a shell of what it once was. Bumpstocks aren’t the only infringement they supported.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:31 am to Reason10
Mourning Joe's response to Trump's tweet;
Joe Scarborough
@JoeNBC
·
49m
Trump’s violent rhetoric about Supreme Court members firing “shotgun blasts into the face” of Americans, while claiming the court will abolish the 2nd Amendment, is violent rhetoric clearly intended to inflame extremists and spark violence against judges.
Joe Scarborough
@JoeNBC
·
49m
Trump’s violent rhetoric about Supreme Court members firing “shotgun blasts into the face” of Americans, while claiming the court will abolish the 2nd Amendment, is violent rhetoric clearly intended to inflame extremists and spark violence against judges.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:32 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
Joe Scarborough
@JoeNBC
·
49m
Trump’s violent rhetoric about Supreme Court members firing “shotgun blasts into the face” of Americans, while claiming the court will abolish the 2nd Amendment, is violent rhetoric clearly intended to inflame extremists and spark violence against judges.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:36 am to LSURulzSEC
quote:
he needs to call out Roberts by name...
It wouldn't matter. Everyone who supports the president knows Roberts in a POS. Roberts and those who support his decisions do not care. Roberts is a cuck for the Washington ruling establishment.
This post was edited on 6/18/20 at 11:38 am
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:38 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
He also doesn't want to become a target of the mob either.
If this has anything to do with his decision then he should be impeached immediately.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:39 am to BuckyCheese
Scarborough with a real cuck tweet.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:42 am to Sentrius
quote:Politicizing it while being apolitical?
An even bigger frick you would be calling out Robert's obsession with being apolitical and that is what is destroying the Supreme Court as an institution and completely politicizing it.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 11:56 am to Magician2
quote:
I hope he publicly and specifically makes his re-election a referendum on Roberts.
Roberts could have voted the other way on the Bostock case, and it wouldn't have mattered.
Trump will be campaigning on the track record of nominating the person who wrote the Bostock opinion. Not a power position.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 12:03 pm to BuckyCheese
Even the Supreme Court is saying F you to Trump now. You guys are starting to become a minority....that must suck Posted on 6/18/20 at 12:15 pm to BuckyCheese
The 2A is not going anywhere. Conservatives act like Libs with the fear-mongering about the 2A.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 12:24 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:Roberts draggimg nuts across potus pumpkin head.
Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn’t like me?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News