re: Trump's FBI

quote:

---

Your explanation doesn't make sense because they always just make a few exceptions for specific cases/reasons rather than just change the entire rule.

---

Again, dumbass, Patel confirmed that anyone who willingly committed such acts remains disqualified. And removing the automatic disqualifier does not mean that these people are automatically hired. They are still subject to case-by-case review and rigorous vetting standards.

The reason they did this, instead of your stupid suggestion here, is because the automatic disqualifier that was in place before legally prevented a file from even reaching the case-by-case evaluation stage.

The way their system works is if a requirement is set as a categorical automatic disqualification, background check systems and polygraph evaluators must reject the application instantly. Under the old system, if an applicant disclosed during the security clearance process that they had been involved in an act of bestiality or prostitution, the protocol required an immediate rejection - regardless of the context, age, or whether the person was a victim of human trafficking or force.

Patel's argument at the hearing was that to even have a case-by-case review, the system cannot trigger an automated rejection the moment the disclosure is flagged.

This is a matter of law.

And this is also a matter of you losers finding yet another reason to scream OMB over some stupid bullshite that is not only inaccurate ("the FBI is 'embracing' beastiliaty"), but is also entirely overblown. We may as well be talking about the Steele dossier and pee tapes all over again.

quote:

---

Again, dumbass, Patel confirmed that anyone who willingly committed such acts remains disqualified. And removing the automatic disqualifier does not mean that these people are automatically hired. They are still subject to case-by-case review and rigorous vetting standards.

The reason they did this, instead of your stupid suggestion here, is because the automatic disqualifier that was in place before legally prevented a file from even reaching the case-by-case evaluation stage.

The way their system works is if a requirement is set as a categorical automatic disqualification, background check systems and polygraph evaluators must reject the application instantly. Under the old system, if an applicant disclosed during the security clearance process that they had been involved in an act of bestiality or prostitution, the protocol required an immediate rejection - regardless of the context, age, or whether the person was a victim of human trafficking or force.

Patel's argument at the hearing was that to even have a case-by-case review, the system cannot trigger an automated rejection the moment the disclosure is flagged.

---

So this is a common occurrence?

quote:

---

And this is also a matter of you losers finding yet another reason to scream OMB over some stupid bullshite that is not only inaccurate ("the FBI is 'embracing' beastiliaty"), but is also entirely overblown. We may as well be talking about the Steele dossier and pee tapes all over again.

---

Did it ever occur to you that you are the one that makes it always about Trump, not everyone else?

Nobody said a word about Trump. The topic is about questionable FBI changes.