- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump threatens the New York Times
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:04 am to joshnorris14
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:04 am to joshnorris14
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:05 am to Bench McElroy
Expect a little bit more rise due to this tweet.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:05 am to member12
quote:
Hitler tweeted about the NYT too
I guess we should throw out all historically references since that didn't have cell phones and the internet during those times.
No more Maoist or Marxist reference from here forward.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:05 am to lsu2006
quote:
He could always just "repeal" NYT v. Sullivan and its progeny
You do know that presidents have ignored SCOTUS rulings in the past, correct?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:06 am to joshnorris14
quote:Congress will get their top men on it right away
Change libel laws?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:06 am to NYNolaguy1
And you plan on ignoring by suing for libel in a court system how?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:07 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
You do know that presidents have ignored SCOTUS rulings in the past, correct?
Presidents and politicians of all walks of life have ignored the constitution and supreme court rulings since the inception of this country. What's your point? I'm only referring to his petty bullshite about "changing libel laws".
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:09 am to The_Duke
quote:
Would this qualify as hitleresque?
Hitleresque?? He's literally Hitler.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:09 am to BBONDS25
I am praying to God as we type that, if Obama sues Trump for libel, Trump hires a Poliboarder to defend him and deposes Obama. 
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:10 am to Dale51
Nah, Hitler wouldn't have fricked up repeal and replace.
Trump is an older, less charming Biff Tannen.
Trump is an older, less charming Biff Tannen.
This post was edited on 3/30/17 at 11:11 am
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:12 am to Walking the Earth
How many hours would be spent on establishing Onama's Muslim allegiance?
This post was edited on 3/30/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:14 am to Dale51
quote:
He's literally Hitler.
Didn't this "literally Hitler" term originate from the right in their attempt to delegitimize any comparison to Trump to Hitler?
I think that's how it went. No one ever said he was literally anything.
This post was edited on 3/30/17 at 11:15 am
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:15 am to Toddy
quote:
Obama has too much class, but I wish he would sue Trump for libel.
Except for the part where his own staff went on MSNBC and confirmed they were grabbing intel of Trump staff and passing it around
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:15 am to The_Duke
"Literally Hitler" has been around way longer than Trump.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:15 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
The stuff they say about him does border on libel.
The bullshite they spew on a good number of things probably violates libel laws. These "unbiased media" outlets are nothing more than propaganda mouthpieces for the right and left by and large. Pravda Lite.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:16 am to genuineLSUtiger
The those people should sue, but they want (because they have no case).
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:16 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
NYT is up almost $2 since this time last year, Trump is, quite ironically, a huge boon for them.
Understand what you are saying, and I agree that Trump has probably helped the NYT. However, how do they compare to 10 years ago? Let's face it...people are going elsewhere for their news these days and almost (If not all) newspapers are in trouble because of that.
Just because they have gotten a small bump because of Trump doesn't mean they are doing fine.
The New York Times Company reported a $14 million net loss for the first quarter of 2016 as it continued to grapple with how to offset falling revenue in print advertising. Digital subscriptions remained a bright spot for the company, showing robust growth.
From the horses mouth
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:17 am to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
The bullshite they spew on a good number of things probably violates libel laws.
Examples, please? And in listing your examples please explain in what way the statements are libelous. Thanks.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:17 am to Haughton99
quote:
Poor thing can't handle people not saying nice things about him. Gonna sue them for libel. At least he spelled libel correctly.
He's not wrong about libel laws. You shouldn't be able to just post anything you want and if it's a total lie "too bad, you're a public figure"
Of course the irony is that he lies about people all the time, but that's a different matter altogether.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:18 am to DawgsLife
I mean there is a huge problem for print media in general right now. I'm not arguing that, I just find it funny that Trump continues to throw them bones.
I wonder how much stock he owns.
I wonder how much stock he owns.
Popular
Back to top


1






