- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Just Said He's Showing Up at SCOTUS tomorrow to listen to birthright citizen
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:26 pm to IMSA_Fan
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:26 pm to IMSA_Fan
Are you really this stupid??
I am asking you a serious question.
For security reasons alone, your statement is non-sensible.
Are you familiar with the 2 public attempts on his life?
Stop posting and let the adults discuss serious topics regarding the SCOTUS decisions.
We need some kind of intelligence test you have to pass before you can post. Keep the immature children off the site....... it getting absurd around here.

I am asking you a serious question.
For security reasons alone, your statement is non-sensible.
Are you familiar with the 2 public attempts on his life?
Stop posting and let the adults discuss serious topics regarding the SCOTUS decisions.
We need some kind of intelligence test you have to pass before you can post. Keep the immature children off the site....... it getting absurd around here.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:28 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You think Trump will wear a tan suit to the hearing?
quote:
boosiebadazz
Oh, look. Temu sfp has made an appearance.
PS - Spoiler Alert. Being "Temu SFP" is about as bad as it gets.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:33 pm to KCT
I remember a poster here named KarlaCircleTiger bitching about Obama’s suits, his golfing, and the vacations he took with his family.
She was such a faggy c(u)nt she had to get rid of that name and start over
She was such a faggy c(u)nt she had to get rid of that name and start over
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:34 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:Yup yup. Why the executive and judicial are doing just that.
Sounds like a political question for the political branches to take up.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:36 pm to HagaDaga
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:39 pm to 1putt
quote:
He needs to stay away!
I’m starting to despise this guy.
He’s just a dumb person.
Where did the man with the Gold Crown touch you to make you so angry and wong?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I remember a poster here named KarlaCircleTiger bitching about Obama’s suits, his golfing, and the vacations he took with his family.
I criticized Obama for being an America-hating race-baiting community AGITATOR. You would have criticized him, too, but you were too stupid to figure it out.
quote:
She was such a faggy c(u)nt she had to get rid of that name and start over
I shortened my name to KCT because a lot of people thought that Karla was my name instead of the name of a street. You know that, but you're such a lightweight and a scumbag that it incredulously still gives you pleasure to pretend that I'm a female.
Which is kind of ironic coming from a pathetic pussy such as yourself.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:45 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
They’ll overrule it. Alito, Thomas, Kav, Barrett are definites. Three goobers on the other side.
Gorsuch wrote the tariff opinion and led the anti-Chevron deference brigade for years like he wants to defer to Congress and cede power back to them, but he could be convinced by some obscure contemporaneous writings in the subject.
Roberts is likely a no, but I could see him giving the Admin a vote here as he is ultimately counting all of the balls and strikes he calls in his Court.
I think everyone should brace themselves for SCOTUS failing America tomorrow and what will come as a consequence of that.
Trump is drawing a hard line in our immigration and election laws. If the SCOTUS fails us on upholding the law, the legislature refuses to do their jobs, etc etc, we are going to find ourselves in a constitutional crisis.
POTUS has a lot more strength in reserve than people realize right now.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:46 pm to KCT
quote:
I shortened my name to KCT because a lot of people thought that Karla was my name instead of the name of a street. You know that, but you're such a lightweight and a scumbag that it incredulously still gives you pleasure to pretend that I'm a female.
Which is kind of ironic coming from a pathetic pussy such as yourself.
It was just a small, yet ultimately telling thing about what a laughably insecure crazy person you are, Freud.
Little did we know you had so many more meltdowns to give us
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:48 pm to AlterEd
quote:
If the SCOTUS fails us on upholding the law, the legislature refuses to do their jobs, etc etc, we are going to find ourselves in a constitutional crisis.
POTUS has a lot more strength in reserve than people realize right now.
$4 gas and higher grocery prices make it tough for even the most ardent Patriots to take to the streets.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
... POTUS has a long more strength in reserve than people realize right now.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:52 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Alito, Thomas, Kav, Barrett are definites
Barrett is absolutely not a definite
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:52 pm to AlterEd
The Joos have schismed the hard right. It’s always the economy, stupid. Daddy will rant and rave like he always does, but he’s made consequential decisions this term that have had real-world effects for his supporters.
Describe what you’re envisioning if SCOTUS maintains birthright citizenship and Trump wants to flex…
Describe what you’re envisioning if SCOTUS maintains birthright citizenship and Trump wants to flex…
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:52 pm to boosiebadazz
You said "political branches" should take it up. And I mentioned 2 political (ie govt) branches that are taking it up.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:53 pm to LordSaintly
I actually agree with that. I wrote her in just to make it closer than it probably will be.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:54 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
you flipped your shite repeatedly because you couldn’t handle people not knowing YOU ARE A MAN, GODDAMNIT.
Total lie by you, as usual. I merely went to the "Help Board, and requested the name change in order to clear up the confusion.
Over 10 years later, and you're practically the only person who ever brings it up. Like I always say, you're nothing but a punk-arse troll. 90% of this board figured you out a long time ago.
Have a good night, Temu Tampon Timmy.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:54 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
You said "political branches" should take it up. And I mentioned 2 political (ie govt) branches that are taking it up.
Oh man, that’s not what that means when talking about the judiciary. Start with the Federalist Papers and go from there.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:55 pm to boosiebadazz
Gotcha. I agree about the others though.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:55 pm to KCT
quote:
Tampon
You would know about that being an irrational woman and all
Popular
Back to top


0




