- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/5/22 at 6:03 am to DellTronJon
quote:
That being said Trump does not care about any of this, and I would never trust him or any other politician to write anything defending out natural rights.
I would trust TRUMP over any DEMOCRAT is any leadership position today - Name ONE of them who is on par with Trump in defending 'natural rights'
Trump may be inarticulate in Hahvahd-speak, but he is honest to the core. I would prefer him to any smooth-talking lawyer who has his hands in everyone's back pocket and his eyes on his next corner office.
DEMOCRATs today are for one thing only - absolute POWER over every aspect of enslaved lives. Nothing else will satisfy them - no evil daunts their will to achieve that mastery. Anyone who does not see that now is just part of the 'stockholm syndrome' population the Democrats depend on for their cover.
Posted on 12/5/22 at 6:13 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So I did something novel.
I actually read Trump's post.
It's something you obviously haven't done.
yep = all they can do is read the XNN distortion of what Trump actually wrote.
I continue to be amazed at the absolute lack of self-awareness of these idiots. Not an ounce of introspection. Not a mote of shame. Not an iota of self-respect.
All they are reduced to is an rabid search for a single phrase that can be taken out of context and misinterpreted within some new context totally opposite to the original intent.
They have done this over and over - and when they can find no phrase that even THEY cannot misinterpret, they just INVENT one to get enraged about
"DON'T SAY GAY" is the most embarrassing of their recent lies - but they are still PROUD of their efforts because of the 'conversation' it started.
unworthy simps
Posted on 12/5/22 at 6:16 am to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
quote:
COVID gave us Biden. Absent COVID, Trump would have won in 2020.
wut??
what is going on here??
but
Posted on 12/5/22 at 6:22 am to DaTruth7
quote:
You morons have no reading comprehension. He said allowing a fake election makes the constitution useless. And he is right.
I kept seeing articles and comments about it and ignored it as usual Dim bullshite. I finally read what happened and yep, it’s the usual Dim bullshite only it seems quite a few Republicans have also become Dim over the issue
The sad thing is it was a foxnews article about Musk comments that finally got me to read about it. I guess even the great Elon Musk slips up every now and then
This post was edited on 12/5/22 at 6:26 am
Posted on 12/5/22 at 6:23 am to CelticDog
quote:
Maybe he did.
maybe???
maybe Biden sold out America's interests in order to line his pockets with $$$$
maybe the Democrats are convinced that ordinary Americans reject them, so they are hell bent on replacing the current population with poverty-stricken people who have never known anything about freedom in order to 'win' future elections.
maybe the 'mass mail-in ballot' initiative was not due to any fear of 'convenient-pandemic' at all, but was just used as an excuse to implement something the Dems have wanted for all time = the destruction of normal 'Election Day' voting in exchange for 'convenience' for all their lazy subjects and 'opportunity' to engage in massive election fraud - just MAYBE.
hell, we could play this all day.
MAYBE?????
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:39 pm to CelticDog
Maybe we find out more if all of the video evidence from that day is released. Why won’t NP let anyone see that? Answer that or is she too busy protecting her butt pirate of a husband?
Back to top


0




