- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump comes out strongly against port automation
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:25 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:25 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They are becoming what they have fought against most of their lives.
Dems recently completed that journey with the MIC.
It could be that both groups are simply traveling on the opposite end of a mobius strip.
The journey back begins again.
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 7:32 am
1
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:26 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Dems recently completed that journey with the MIC.
Yep, appears we are just trading issues.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:28 am to Street Hawk
Frank Sobotka would be proud
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:31 am to goldennugget
quote:
Frank Sobotka would be proud
Be careful referencing him on here. You'll be called a pedophile.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 7:32 am
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:32 am to RogerTheShrubber
I get it’s a figure of speech, obviously. BUT, most of those middle management positions will be automated by AI software as well.
Were you gonna go once that happens? Most large corporations are already making this move.
Were you gonna go once that happens? Most large corporations are already making this move.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:34 am to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
most of those middle management positions will be automated by AI software as well.
and Trump has come out favorably for AI and for crypto, they were his biggest donors.
Looks like a collision course.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:34 am to Street Hawk
This sounds more like Trump is negotiating. Drawing the Longshoremen in by voicing support for their position is not a bad thing. As others have stated, the main inefficiencies at the ports isn’t automation, it’s container space and rail logistics. Given time, the automation will happen out of necessity. In the meantime, support by the president for the labor force may help keep them on the job. Like any negotiation, let things play out and see where this goes.
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:34 am to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
Were you gonna go once that happens?
Probably start my own business doing photo tours.
I learned to do a lot of things (carpentry, welding, drafting, photography, public speaking, teaching, etc) so I would never be pigeonholed into one career.
Futurists envision a world where machines do our work, and we all will be gig workers living on a stipend, plus whatever we bring in via gigs.
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 7:36 am
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:36 am to Street Hawk
I’m guessing he didn’t get Elons opinion on this. Automation is inevitable in every sector of our economy. It doesn’t have to be all at once and it doesn’t have to be a matter of mass unemployment. There can be a shift over time to more efficient methods of (insert process here). This, however, is not totally unexpected. You don’t build as many buildings in NYC as Trump has without maintaining good relationships with the unions.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:36 am to Street Hawk
Orange hasnt even been sworn in yet and the salty tears are flowing on both sides
Going to be a wild 4yrs
Going to be a wild 4yrs
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:38 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Going to be an expensive 4yrs
Fixed
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:39 am to Wiseguy
quote:
I’m guessing he didn’t get Elons opinion on this
He seems confused. On one hand trying to cut inefficiency, on the other hand promising to be more inefficient.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:41 am to RogerTheShrubber
Well, if that’s all true then you have my respect.
However, we’re not all created the same, intelligence included. I think keeping a large segment of the low IQ populace employed is essential for the continuation of a stable society.
Otherwise, you’ll have to subsidize their unemployment with UBI or some other big government horse shite that we all end up paying for.
Let’s be real here, the average laid off joe in lower middle class employment will be too lazy, dumb, unmotivated to further their skill set in a marketable way.
However, we’re not all created the same, intelligence included. I think keeping a large segment of the low IQ populace employed is essential for the continuation of a stable society.
Otherwise, you’ll have to subsidize their unemployment with UBI or some other big government horse shite that we all end up paying for.
Let’s be real here, the average laid off joe in lower middle class employment will be too lazy, dumb, unmotivated to further their skill set in a marketable way.
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 7:43 am
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:42 am to RogerTheShrubber
Must suck to be poor then. Im sorry you live paycheck to paycheck in your 60s
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:42 am to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
I think keeping a large segment of the low IQ populace employed is essential for the continuation of a stable society.
If we were smart, we would let these bloodlines die out.
We keep saving them, and they are the ones who keep breeding.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
Yea, but eugenics is illegal, and there are more rabbits than wolves.
Best to keep them producing.
Best to keep them producing.
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 7:44 am
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:43 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Must suck to be poor then. Im sorry you live paycheck to paycheck in your 60s
The fairy tales you progressives create....
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:44 am to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
Yea, but eugenics is illegal,
You dont need eugenics. They'll overdose for you without any help, if you let them.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
You are right I should have said Govt Stimulus check to Govt Stimulus check
Im sorry you will miss out on the winning
But you will be very vocal (crying) about not winning
Im sorry you will miss out on the winning
But you will be very vocal (crying) about not winning
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
I guess you voted Democrat? They’re pro abortion and open borders. Fentanyl?
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News