- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump and Sessions should use an old law to stop the Left.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 3:02 am
Posted on 12/25/16 at 3:02 am
The Smith Act of 1940 signed into law by FDR makes it against Federal Law to advocate the overthrow of the US Government and also requires all non citizen adults in the US to register with the government. The law has been amended a few times and there were certain cases that parts of the law were ruled unconstitutional, BUT....
When the snowflakes hit the streets screaming for the government to be overthrown and advocating revolution, the Justice Department could dust this law off and arrest the leaders and financiers of what we know is coming. Sure they will run to the courts, but they will be out of action for some time while their cases crawl through the system.
They can also use this law to force all adult immigrants to immediately register with the government, or be deported when they fail to do so.
They have this tool in the box, time to use it once again.
When the snowflakes hit the streets screaming for the government to be overthrown and advocating revolution, the Justice Department could dust this law off and arrest the leaders and financiers of what we know is coming. Sure they will run to the courts, but they will be out of action for some time while their cases crawl through the system.
They can also use this law to force all adult immigrants to immediately register with the government, or be deported when they fail to do so.
They have this tool in the box, time to use it once again.
This post was edited on 12/25/16 at 3:07 am
16
Posted on 12/25/16 at 3:28 am to antibarner
Posted on 12/25/16 at 3:35 am to antibarner
The frick?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 3:40 am to antibarner
So when a liberal uses that law to round up some Tea Partiers you'll be okay with that? If Obama had done what you are advocating this board would have lost its shite.
The problem with laws like that is they seem great when your side is in charge but not so much when the other side has power.
If you guys can't handle some hollering from your opponents then you need to nut up.
Plus, freedom of speech and assembly and all that.
The problem with laws like that is they seem great when your side is in charge but not so much when the other side has power.
If you guys can't handle some hollering from your opponents then you need to nut up.
Plus, freedom of speech and assembly and all that.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 3:45 am to antibarner
I have no doubt that Jeff Sessions masturbates to the thought of this.
He is the only reason I am second guessing myself for voting Trump to this point, he needs to be jettisoned immediately.
He is the only reason I am second guessing myself for voting Trump to this point, he needs to be jettisoned immediately.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:00 am to BamaChick
Speak freely all you wish. But when you are out there screaming revolution and rioting, which we saw on several occasions during the campaign, this is a way to stop the George Soroses of the world that finance this and the"community organizers" that foment violence.
I would not advocate using it against peaceful protesters, but there were far too many that were not.
We can also use this to force the illegals to come out of hiding. A perfect tool and already on the books.
I would not advocate using it against peaceful protesters, but there were far too many that were not.
We can also use this to force the illegals to come out of hiding. A perfect tool and already on the books.
This post was edited on 12/25/16 at 6:06 am
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:01 am to antibarner
Elections have consequences. 
MAGA!
MAGA!
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:12 am to Crimson Wraith
You could use this law to round every last one of them up. The illegals either check in or they are wanted fugitives. And as they come in contact with different agencies they are picked up.
This post was edited on 12/25/16 at 6:13 am
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:13 am to antibarner
No, we won't do any such thing. They are revealing their true nature to the people of our Republic, and destroying themselves in the process. The media, Soros, Bloomberg etc have finally over reached, and that is the one thing that can't be undone.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:19 am to BamaChick
quote:
So when a liberal uses that law to round up some Tea Partiers you'll be okay with that? If Obama had done what you are advocating this board would have lost its shite.
What part of NON CITIZENS do you not understand?
People who are not citizens have ZERO rights under our constitution.
"Tea Partiers" are citizens.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:24 am to cave canem
quote:
I have no doubt that Jeff Sessions masturbates to the thought of this.
He is the only reason I am second guessing myself for voting Trump to this point, he needs to be jettisoned immediately.
The OP is some dumb awful shite, followed fairly closely by your irrational fear of Jeff Sessions.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:38 am to antibarner
Got damn, you are a dumb mo-fo. Which one of your nutjob websites did you find this gem?
It must suck to go through life with this much anger and ignorance. Merry Christmas to you and yours. Forget bout politics for one day.
quote:
The law has been amended a few times and there were certain cases that parts of the law were ruled unconstitutional, BUT....
It must suck to go through life with this much anger and ignorance. Merry Christmas to you and yours. Forget bout politics for one day.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:01 am to antibarner
Hell, let's just deport everyone who's last name ends in Z
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:06 am to antibarner
quote:
signed into law by FDR
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:35 am to Loserman
quote:
followed fairly closely by your irrational fear of Jeff Sessions.
I don't fear him, he is just big part of the problems in this country. Let me know which of these you agree with.
Why I am not a fan
Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on repealing tax subsidy for companies which move US jobs offshore. (Mar 2005)
Voted YES on increasing penalties for drug offenses. (Nov 1999)
Voted NO on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education. (Mar 2005)
Voted NO on banning "soft money" contributions and restricting issue ads. (Mar 2002)
Voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. (Mar 2004)
Voted YES on regulating tobacco as a drug. (Jun 2009)
Voted NO on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on increasing Medicaid rebate for producing generics. (Nov 2005)
Voted NO on negotiating bulk purchases for Medicare prescription drug. (Mar 2005)
Voted YES on limiting self-employment health deduction. (Jul 1999)
Voted YES on Medicare means-testing. (Jun 1997)
The below is where my biggest issues lay
Voted YES on extending the PATRIOT Act's roving wiretaps. (Feb 2011)
Voted YES on cutting $221M in benefits to Filipinos who served in WWII US Army. (Apr 2008)
Voted NO on requiring FISA court warrant to monitor US-to-foreign calls. (Feb 2008)
Voted YES on removing need for FISA warrant for wiretapping abroad. (Aug 2007)
Voted NO on limiting soldiers' deployment to 12 months. (Jul 2007)
Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)
Voted YES on extending the PATRIOT Act's wiretap provision. (Dec 2005)
Voted NO on restricting business with entities linked to terrorism. (Jul 2005)
Voted NO on adopting the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. (Oct 1999)
Voted NO on banning chemical weapons. (Apr 1997)
Voted YES on allowing more foreign workers into the US for farm work. (Jul 1998)
Voted YES on extending unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks. (Nov 2008)
Voted NO on limiting farm subsidies to people earning under $750,000. (Dec 2007)
Voted YES on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Feb 2007)
Posted on 12/25/16 at 8:39 am to BamaChick
quote:
So when a liberal uses that law to round up some Tea Partiers you'll be okay with that? If Obama had done what you are advocating this board would have lost its shite.
How does the Tea Party fit your description? They advocated for adherence TO the Constitution and law. They also suggested that our elected officials actually read the bills they sign into law as per their oath of office. Sooo...what do you mean?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 8:45 am to antibarner
quote:
When the snowflakes hit the streets screaming for the government to be overthrown and advocating revolution
Weren't you Trumpkins armed and ready to do this if HiIlary had been elected?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 9:01 am to antibarner
So screw the First Amendment because you don't like 'em?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 9:08 am to BamaChick
quote:
If you guys can't handle some hollering from your opponents then you need to nut up. Plus, freedom of speech and assembly and all that.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 9:25 am to skinny domino
Silly post. Because a peaceful protest is one thing, but what went on during the campaign at Trump Rallies was something else.
Hit the streets advocating revolution, killing Trump and other ignorance, while damaging property, threatening the safety of others and just plain violating their civil rights IMO this law applies to YOU.
Hit the streets advocating revolution, killing Trump and other ignorance, while damaging property, threatening the safety of others and just plain violating their civil rights IMO this law applies to YOU.
This post was edited on 12/25/16 at 9:26 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News