- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump a genius or pushing closer to NWO??
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:05 am
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:05 am
Post from Reddit:
Reddit
Would this transition be good for the people of the United States, potentially limiting the size and power the government holds over us now.....or would this create a situation where our government would rely on funding from other countries, opening the door for the US to be controlled from the outside.
quote:
Holy shite this is massive. I don't think anybody caught this during today's cabinet meeting but Trump just launched his opening Salvo against the Federal Reserve and the IRS!!!! First a tiny little history lesson: Back in the day before the Federal Reserve and the IRS the US government was funded by import tariffs. Import tariffs kept the government funded and in check because the government can only gets as big as its funding will allow. When the Federal Reserve came in, tariffs started to disappear because the federal government was funded by Federal Reserve notes, which is fiat currency. What that means is that every time the US government needs to pay for something it has to go to the Federal Reserve Central Bank which is a private Corporation which would print the money out of thin air, backed by nothing, AT INTEREST, which was then passed on to us the American People in the form of the Income Tax. This private Corporation then loans the money to the US government with interest attached to it. Well, who pays the interest on the money the government borrows from the Federal Reserve? WE DO!!! the US taxpayer see the form of the income tax. WHAT TRUMP JUST SAID HERE IS MASSIVE HE JUST TOLD THE WORLD THAT YOU CAN FUND THE US GOVERNMENT THROUGH IMPORT TARIFFS AND THAT THROUGH DOING SO WE DON'T HAVE TO PAY INCOME TAX AND BACK IN THE DAY WHEN WE DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY INCOME TAX WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY DEBT!! The Cliff Notes version? Trump is slowly putting the tariffs back in place to prepare for his battle against the Federal Reserve in the second term. If he can slowly restore the Tariff structure of the US government and fund our government that way, then he can then go after the Federal Reserve and the IRS and they can't do anything retaliatory to destroy the economy because we will have money coming in from import tariffs. Remember this.
Would this transition be good for the people of the United States, potentially limiting the size and power the government holds over us now.....or would this create a situation where our government would rely on funding from other countries, opening the door for the US to be controlled from the outside.
7
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:08 am to tigerdude3232
If he tries to frick with the federal reserve/rothschilds i would really start to worry about him getting assassinated soon. The NWO wont stand for that.
This post was edited on 6/27/18 at 9:09 am
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:17 am to Cosmo
isn't that why Jack Kennedy was killed?
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:36 am to tigerdude3232
quote:
Trump a genius or pushing closer to NWO??
NWO is already in control via Fed Reserve. Not sure how much closer he can push us.
Gutting the Fed will be his greatest accomplishment. The current draining of the swamp will protect him from a hit (see Q thread for how that is going down).
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:41 am to TaderSalad
quote:
quote:
Trump a genius or pushing closer to NWO??
NWO is already in control via Fed Reserve. Not sure how much closer he can push us.
Gutting the Fed will be his greatest accomplishment. The current draining of the swamp will protect him from a hit (see Q thread for how that is going down).
If our government funding relied on foreign governments, wouldn't this make our country lose control of it's own finances? Thus putting us in a situation where we are actually more susceptible to being controlled by the NWO.
This post was edited on 6/27/18 at 9:44 am
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:44 am to tigerdude3232
quote:
Would this transition be good for the people of the United States, potentially limiting the size and power the government holds over us now.....or would this create a situation where our government would rely on funding from other countries, opening the door for the US to be controlled from the outside.
Actually, that's how the US would be controlled by the people. The Fed Reserve IS the outside. How does Florida have no state sales tax AND low property taxes (relatively)? Because they place tariffs on their largest "import"....tourism. Those resort fees and hotel/airline fees foot the bill. That is the secret to cutting the cords to the NWO. Tear down the Fed.
This post was edited on 6/27/18 at 9:45 am
Posted on 6/27/18 at 9:44 am to tigerdude3232
quote:
who pays the interest on the money the government borrows from the Federal Reserve? WE DO!!!
Actually the Federal Reserve returns federal government interest payments to the Federal Reserve back to the federal government. That is the law.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:32 am to tigerdude3232
quote:
.or would this create a situation where our government would rely on funding from other countries, opening the door for the US to be controlled from the outside.
Doesn't China already own the majority of the US Debt?
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:34 am to Kracka
quote:
Doesn't China already own the majority of the US Debt?
No.
China owns the most U.S. debt by foreign governments.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:37 am to tigerdude3232
quote:
If our government funding relied on foreign governments, wouldn't this make our country lose control of it's own finances? Thus putting us in a situation where we are actually more susceptible to being controlled by the NWO.
Makes me think of this:
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:40 am to Kracka
Owning debt has nothing to do with it. In this situation we would literally year after year depend on other countries exporting to us and paying the tariffs or we'd have no federal funding...We all know just 1 year of this would destroy the government and make them make drastic moves to maintain their own personal power in society.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:42 am to Tiger in NY
funny, I made a post about how the government was ran by mainly CEO's and corporate executives and everyone on here disagreed unless I created them a detailed list, like I have the time.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:45 am to GumboPot
The Fed Reserve own the most US Debt, right?
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:47 am to tigerdude3232
The tariff history of the United States spans from colonial times to present. The first tariff law passed by the U.S. Congress, acting under the then recently ratified Constitution, was the Tariff of 1789. Its purpose was to generate revenue for the federal government (to run the government and to pay the interest on its debt), and also to act as a protective barrier around domestic industries.[1] An Import tax was collected by treasury agents before goods could be landed at U.S. ports.
Tariffs have historically served a key role in the nation's foreign trade policy. They were the greatest (approaching 95% at times) source of federal revenue until the Federal income tax began after 1913. For well over a century the federal government was largely financed by tariffs averaging about 20% on foreign imports. There are no tariffs for imports or shipments from one state to another. Since the 1940s, foreign trade policies have focused more on reciprocal tariffs and low tariff rates rather than using tariffs as a significant source of Federal tax revenue.
Tariffs were the main source of revenue for the federal government from 1789 to 1914. During this period, there was vigorous debate between the various political parties over the setting of tariff rates. In general Democrats favored a tariff that would pay the cost of government, but no higher. Whigs and Republicans favored higher tariffs to protect and encourage American industry and industrial workers. Since the early 20th century, however, U.S. tariffs have been very low and have been much less a matter of partisan debate.
Prior to the American Civil War tariffs were generally low, but rose during its duration. At the end of the war in 1865 about 63% of federal revenue was generated by excise taxes, which exceeded the 25.4% generated by tariffs. In 1915 during World War I tariffs generated 30.1% of revenues. Since 1935 tariff income has continued to be a declining percentage of Federal revenues.
Tariffs have historically served a key role in the nation's foreign trade policy. They were the greatest (approaching 95% at times) source of federal revenue until the Federal income tax began after 1913. For well over a century the federal government was largely financed by tariffs averaging about 20% on foreign imports. There are no tariffs for imports or shipments from one state to another. Since the 1940s, foreign trade policies have focused more on reciprocal tariffs and low tariff rates rather than using tariffs as a significant source of Federal tax revenue.
Tariffs were the main source of revenue for the federal government from 1789 to 1914. During this period, there was vigorous debate between the various political parties over the setting of tariff rates. In general Democrats favored a tariff that would pay the cost of government, but no higher. Whigs and Republicans favored higher tariffs to protect and encourage American industry and industrial workers. Since the early 20th century, however, U.S. tariffs have been very low and have been much less a matter of partisan debate.
Prior to the American Civil War tariffs were generally low, but rose during its duration. At the end of the war in 1865 about 63% of federal revenue was generated by excise taxes, which exceeded the 25.4% generated by tariffs. In 1915 during World War I tariffs generated 30.1% of revenues. Since 1935 tariff income has continued to be a declining percentage of Federal revenues.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 10:57 am to dr smartass phd
Thanks for the background info on tariffs, still doesn't answer the question of what it will bring with it in today's world.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 11:00 am to tigerdude3232
I've read this three times and I'm still confused. I'm sure it makes sense to most of you.. but I'm an idiot.
Can someone give me like an 8th grade explanation?
Can someone give me like an 8th grade explanation?
Posted on 6/27/18 at 11:05 am to sweetwaterbilly
I think the theory is that:
If we start taxing imports from foreign countries at a higher rate, then we can generate enough revenue to eliminate income taxes on US citizens and stop needing to borrow "print" money from the federal reserve
And the proof provided, is that prior to 1913, there was no income tax on US Citizens or borrowing from a central bank, but the tariffs were higher, and covered the federal budget.
If we start taxing imports from foreign countries at a higher rate, then we can generate enough revenue to eliminate income taxes on US citizens and stop needing to borrow "print" money from the federal reserve
And the proof provided, is that prior to 1913, there was no income tax on US Citizens or borrowing from a central bank, but the tariffs were higher, and covered the federal budget.
This post was edited on 6/27/18 at 11:07 am
Posted on 6/27/18 at 12:20 pm to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Also the idea would be that the government would be limited in size by the amount earned on tariffs, aka not feeding off citizens, but other governments for feeding off us. Look at the differences in the amount other countries charge us in tariffs compared to the reverse.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 12:59 pm to Cosmo
quote:
If he tries to frick with the federal reserve/rothschilds i would really start to worry about him getting assassinated soon. The NWO wont stand for that.
Yeah, that terrorist group will kill anyone.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 1:03 pm to Dead End
quote:
quote:
If he tries to frick with the federal reserve/rothschilds i would really start to worry about him getting assassinated soon. The NWO wont stand for that.
Yeah, that terrorist group will kill anyone.
It's not as easy as making a few calls like it was in the 1960's
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News