This Day in 20th Century "Coincidences"

For the bonus round, let's look at 1914, too:



I'm sure our PTB Intelligentsia will tell us that these things are wholly unrelated.

Joe Hoft had an interesting piece on GWP about the 17th Amendment:

The 17th Amendment Broke the Founders’ Balance of Power — And Washington Grew Far Beyond Its Constitutional Limits

quote:

---

When the Founders designed the Constitution, they did something extraordinary.

They did not create a government based on a single stream of political power.

They created a system of balanced sources of authority, carefully structured so that no temporary political passion could easily overwhelm the rights of the people.

The House of Representatives was designed to reflect the will of the people directly.

The President was chosen by the Electoral College, ensuring that national leadership reflected both popular support and the union’s federal character.

And the Senate — critically — was designed to represent the states as sovereign political entities within the federal system.

Originally, United States Senators were chosen by state legislatures.

This was not a procedural technicality.

It was one of the Constitution’s central structural protections of liberty.

The Founders understood that political power must be divided not only among branches of government, but among different sources of consent.

The people would have their voice.

But the states — as political communities with their own interests, laws, and traditions — would have their voice as well.

The Senate was designed to ensure that the federal government remained a government of limited and delegated powers, not an engine of national consolidation.

---

quote:

---

The 17th Amendment Removed a Structural Protection Against Federal Overreach

The 17th Amendment shifted the selection of Senators from state legislatures to direct popular election.

On its surface, the change sounded democratic.

But structurally, it removed one of the Constitution’s most important checks on centralized power.

Before the 17th Amendment:

Senators answered to state legislatures
States had direct representation inside the federal government
Federal expansion could be resisted institutionally
State sovereignty had a permanent seat at the table
After the 17th Amendment:

Senators became national politicians
Campaign funding and media influence grew dominant
Senators became more responsive to national party pressures than to their states as sovereign entities
The states lost their direct structural defense inside the federal government
The change did not merely alter a voting method. It altered the architecture of power.

And over time, that architectural change has produced predictable results.

---