- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Syria Was Operating a Clandestine Nuclear Program
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Putin would have delivered them to us.
What do you mean by this? That Putin would have rounded up the regime, put them in handcuffs and turned them over? Don't be silly. He could have disclosed the secret nuclear program and admitted Russia played a part in it, but that would have just led to the same outcome anyways. Namely us bombing the shite out of them over it.
1
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:20 pm to Ailsa
Why do we support an ISIS headchopper running the country?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:20 pm to AlterEd
quote:
What do you mean by this? T
They are Russian proxy states
quote:
He could have disclosed the secret nuclear program and admitted Russia played a part in it, but that would have just led to the same outcome anyways. Namely us bombing the shite out of them over it.
Without Russia, Iran is in pain.
There is a reason why Israel thought now was the time to finally attack Iran. It's b/c Russia is too tied up in Ukraine and is very weak militarily. They didn't have the ability to help Iran and Iran was exposed.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:21 pm to Da Sheik
Not predicting anything. Working from a place of insider information. Big difference.
If I say I think Black Cat will be a cameo in the new Spider-Man film, that's a prediction.
If someone who works at Marvel Studios as an electrician says that Black Cat is in the new Spider-Man film because he was working on the set and saw the actress in costume - that's the opposite of a prediction. That's a spoiler alert.
If I say I think Black Cat will be a cameo in the new Spider-Man film, that's a prediction.
If someone who works at Marvel Studios as an electrician says that Black Cat is in the new Spider-Man film because he was working on the set and saw the actress in costume - that's the opposite of a prediction. That's a spoiler alert.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:21 pm to Da Sheik
quote:
Q predicts the future again
It can't be denied in this case. 100% a "future proves past" moment.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:22 pm to AlterEd
This information would have to be discovered via a 3-letter agency, yes? Why the 7-8 year lag to ambiguously link Iran to it?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:22 pm to AlterEd
quote:
It can't be denied in this case. 100% a "future proves past" moment.
Cite the Q post(s) that specifically prove this story
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
Q mentioned Syria a few times over a three year period so future proves past. 
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is a reason why Israel thought now was the time to finally attack Iran. It's b/c Russia is too tied up in Ukraine and is very weak militarily. They didn't have the ability to help Iran and Iran was exposed.
This almost certainly played a factor in the timing of events, sure. And probably why Trump hasn't leaned harder on them to stop fighting. Still yet, I don't think Russia would have done much had they not been engaged in Ukraine. They certainly wouldn't have come to the mat with the US militarily. We also got reports that the Ayatollahs family did not find safe haven in Russia when this began. Russia turned their backs on them. Maybe they were leveraged into it, maybe they were cooperating. I don't think it actually matters though as the end result is the same either way.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are remarkably bad at this.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:27 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
This information would have to be discovered via a 3-letter agency, yes?
No. It's been in the public for a year
IAEA Gains Access to Former Syrian Nuclear Sites
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will have unrestricted access to sites in Syria to resolve a years-long investigation into the country's nuclear program, it was announced after IAEA Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi and Syria’s transitional President Ahmed al-Sharaa met June 4-5 in Damascus.
quote:
Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) briefs journalists after a June 9 meeting of the agency’s board of governors. One issue he discussed was Syria’s decision to give the IAEA unrestricted access to sites in Syria to resolve a yearslong investigation into the country’s nuclear program. (Photo by Dean Calma/IAEA)Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) briefs journalists after a June 9 meeting of the agency’s board of governors. One issue he discussed was Syria’s decision to give the IAEA unrestricted access to sites in Syria to resolve a yearslong investigation into the country’s nuclear program.
The agreement affects four locations, including a suspected undeclared former nuclear site in the Deir el-Zour province. The site allegedly housed a clandestine nuclear reactor that was built with the aid of North Korea; Israeli airstrikes destroyed the facility in 2007. (See ACT, April 2018.)
quote:
July/August 2025
IAEA Makes Progress on Syria’s Undeclared Past Nuclear Program
quote:
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in its latest safeguards report on Syria’s past undeclared nuclear program that environmental sampling at one of three sites “functionally related” to the undeclared nuclear reactor at Dair Alzour site, aka Al Kibar reactor, showed the strong presence of uranium particles, produced as a result of chemical processing.[1] This is consistent with the long-standing view that the site, Marj as Sultan, was an important, undeclared uranium conversion and fuel fabrication site.[2] Director General Rafael Grossi in a June 2025 press conference confirmed these earlier findings when he stated that this site was “where uranium conversion, processing, and fuel fabrication for the reactor at Dair Alzour was taking place.”[3]
quote:
This IAEA finding follows a reversal of years of stonewalling on the part of Syria. In March 2024, the IAEA obtained an agreement with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad that allowed the inspectors to visit the three sites functionally related to the Dair Alzour reactor. In the course of 2024, the IAEA visited all three sites and took environmental samples.
However, the Assad regime did not show any new willingness to reveal the undeclared nuclear reactor program. Assad’s regime refused to acknowledge that the site attacked by Israel in 2007 was a nearly complete nuclear reactor, a position that had been contradicted dramatically by a 2011 Board of Governors resolution that found Syria was building an undeclared nuclear reactor in violation of its safeguards agreement. By the time of the Board resolution, the IAEA was aware of three functionally related sites but made no public determination about their specific function at that time.
After the Assad regime fell in December 2024, the new al-Sharaa government decided to continue cooperating with the IAEA. In June 2025, the IAEA reported that the government has agreed to cooperate “through full transparency, to address Syria’s past nuclear activities.” It allowed the IAEA to return in early June 2025, in what the IAEA called an “exceptional visit,” to Marj as Sultan,[4] where the IAEA took additional environmental samples. The IAEA also requested the government’s assistance in “returning to the Dair Alzour site [Al Kibar reactor site] in the next few months in order to conduct further analysis, access relevant documentation and to talk to those involved in Syria’s past nuclear activities.”
quote:
September 18, 2025
The IAEA knew about the illegality of their nuclear program in 2011
The Uranium One transfer was in 2013, for those following
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:27 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
You are remarkably bad at this.
I understand how actual sourcing and citation methods seem strange to you
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:30 pm to AlterEd
Just yesterday someone was saying the Syrians were going to contain Hezbola, bringing peace in Lebanon. Surely we can trust them.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:31 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
Why the 7-8 year lag to ambiguously link Iran to it?
That isn't ambiguous. They straight up said that the program was never ceased after the first time we went in and bombed it. The new revelation here is that they just kept the program running literally in the same spot that we had already bombed previously. That is true. Verified. They also give the chain of custody of the uranium that can be verified except for the final leg (from North Korea to Iran/Syria), but again, the new revelation here is that the program was off the books, so it would track that the uranium was smuggled in that last leg.
As for the lag? How else can you get insider information out to people over the internet and still maintain operational security? They couldn't give real time info without compromising the mission.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:31 pm to AlterEd
Thank God Team America Stopped them.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:34 pm to AlterEd
quote:
They also give the chain of custody of the uranium that can be verified except for the final leg (from North Korea to Iran/Syria),
Who did? Where?
I just looked through a lot of literature (this has been going on a year now so there is a lot) and I didn't see this chain of custody information. What source did you uncover with it?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:35 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Q mentioned Syria a few times over a three year period so future proves past.
This is what I anticipate.
I'll await their cites to prove the argument, before fully judging.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Sorry I didn’t Ai all of that myself. I will make sure to ‘follow’ the dates in the future. I was more interested in how Q was ‘ahead of this’ by years and why Iran is now linked to this.
The IAEA knew about the illegality of their nuclear program in 2011 . The Uranium One transfer was in 2013, for those following
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The IAEA knew about the illegality of their nuclear program in 2011
Correction. The IAEA suspected they were operating an illegal program in 2011. It was only recently confirmed.
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News