re: Stephen Miller- administration considering suspending habeas corpus

quote:

---

To intentionally limit government and disperse its power along with the threat of democracy and the factions referenced in Federalists 9 and 10

---

Yes, that's a nice textbook answer,

but deeper. I mean to the core.


It's a system to assist a group of people survive and thrive.


And what happens when that system no longer fulfills that function, or works against it?


Hint: it's in the Declaration of Independence.

quote:

---

Yes, that's a nice textbook answer,

but deeper. I mean to the core.


It's a system to assist a group of people survive and thrive.

---

You're changing what our actual Constitution is. There is a way to do that and it's via Amendment, not by random declaration.

quote:

---

And what happens when that system no longer fulfills that function, or works against it?

---

Here's the fruit of the dishonest framing above

Again, if you don't think that it's functioning correctly, there's a way to correct that and it's the amendment process

quote:

---

Hint: it's in the Declaration of Independence.

---

Literally are relevant to a discussion about our government as the declaration of Independence has no bearing on our actual government whatsoever

quote:

---

We're in a period of mass expansion of emotional thinking and shedding rationality, correct.

---

No.

We're in an expanding Information Age where more people can read the actual work product of our institutions and find them wanting.

The decisions that were accepted but not understood due to lack of information and trust in government are now being scrutinized and found to be absurd. You think some baw that graduated lsu in 1940 had easy access to Supreme Court opinions or criticisms of those opinions?

You used to frequently question fundamentally absurd Supreme Court precedence, but now that your insecurities have created irrational fear that those same courts won't protect you, you're defending their legitimacy.

quote:

---

Again, if you don't think that it's functioning correctly, there's a way to correct that and it's the amendment process

---

I reject the court is acting within its constitutional remit.

Because it isn't.

Take that trash somewhere else.

quote:

---

We're in an expanding Information Age where more people can read the actual work product of our institutions and find them wanting.

---

Their ignorance in how the system works in combination of their feelings doesn't change our system. That's specifically why our system was built this way, to avoid that mass expansion of emotion and shedding rationality in large groups.

quote:

---

The decisions that were accepted but not understood due to lack of information

---

Were? Are is still appropriate. See: This thread.

Your ignorance and inability to comprehend isn't the fault of those who aren't ignorant and do comprehend.

It is, however, our responsibility to educate you, which is what I am doing.

quote:

---

but now that your insecurities have created irrational fear

---

quote:

---

I've only argued that removing them has to follow our laws and Constitution

---

This is true. You’ve never argued they should follow laws coming here

quote:

---

I reject the court is acting within its constitutional remit.

---

And yet you can't explain why other than randomly invalidating actions you don't like.

quote:

---

Because it isn't.

---

Point above proven in real time

So the next step in due process is to find them and remove them.

quote:

---

So the next step in due process is to find them and remove them.

---

Sure, within the limits of our laws and constitution.

Any action taken in violation of either is illegal and courts are mandated to rule as such.

Just became someone like Stephen Miller tells you it's legal doesn't make it so, and just because a court correctly rules an action is illegal doesn't mean they're acting politically, in violation of the Constitution, or are now somehow illegitimate.

That's just throwing a temper tantrum because you listened to dishonest or stupid people at the outset.

quote:

---

That's just throwing a temper tantrum because you listened to dishonest or stupid people at the outset.

---

Only tds loons throw tantrums and I don’t need Stephen miller to tell me that illegals shouldn’t be here and if here rounded up and sent home. What are they going to argue in court? Please explain what argument an illegal alien has.