Stefan Halper infiltrated the Trump campaign, was paid by DOD

this needs to be cleaned up:

quote:

---

had a start date of September 26, 2016

---

quote:

---

Halper approached Page ... on July 11, 2016, six weeks after the September 26 DoD award start date

---

July 11 is not 6 weeks after Sept 26

quote:

---

Halper approached Page ... on July 11, 2016, six weeks after the September 26 DoD award start date

---

quote:

---

July 11 is not 6 weeks after Sept 26

---

quote:

---

As TheDCNF reported back in March, Halper contacted Papadopoulos through email on Sept. 2, 2016, offering to fly him to London to discuss writing a policy paper about energy issues in Turkey, Israel and Cyprus. Halper offered to pay $3,000 for the paper.

---

Halper approached Page ... on July 11, 2016, six weeks BEFORE Halper approached PapaD on SEP 2, 2016.
Is that better?

So let’s see if I have this right...

Diverting funds from DoD to finance illegal spying on a presidential campaign: GOOD

Diverting funds from DoD to build a wall (which, incidentally, is in the interest of national security): BAD

quote:

---

The scandal is that the FBI, lacking the incriminating evidence needed to justify opening a criminal investigation of the Trump campaign, decided to open a counterintelligence investigation. With the blessing of the Obama White House, they took the powers that enable our government to spy on foreign adversaries and used them to spy on Americans — Americans who just happened to be their political adversaries.
And the advantage of a "counterintelligence investigation", unlike a criminal investigation, is that everything in it is "classified". So that even an obvious set-up at a Cambridge confab or Kensington wine bar is "intelligence" that has to be "protected" for "national security" reasons. It's a brazen, audacious scheme, and unlikely to have been loosed without the approval, however discreetly stated, of the then President. Occam's Razor suggests that the man running the operation was the CIA's John Brennan through the "inter-agency taskforce" that met at Langley. But Brennan isn't that reckless: Go back to Madeleine Albright urging Carter Page to speak up at a Cambridge conference; Christopher Steele leaking parts of his dossier to the newspapers; a staffer at Australia House inviting George Papadopoulos for a drink... The best way to turn nothing into something is to plant it somewhere far away and wait for it to work its way back to you:

Britain's spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump's campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told.

Golly, you don't say! I wonder who "told" The Guardian that. A conference here, a speech there, a cocktail round the corner, and pretty soon you have the simulacrum of "counterintelligence" concerns from America's closest allies:

According to one account, GCHQ's then head, Robert Hannigan, passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan. The matter was deemed so sensitive it was handled at "director level". After an initially slow start, Brennan used GCHQ information and intelligence from other partners to launch a major inter-agency investigation.

Er, wait a minute. If it's "so sensitive" it's being handled "director-to-director", why isn't the head of GCHQ meeting with his opposite number at NSA? Why's he meeting with Brennan?

Hey, don't get hung up on details. It all went brilliantly - except for one tiny detail: Hillary managed to do the impossible and lose. On January 23rd 2017, three days after Trump's inauguration, GCHQ at Cheltenham Tweeted the sad fate of Mr So Sensitive:

We're sorry to announce that Robert Hannigan, our Director since 2014, has decided to step down as head of GCHQ.

Oh, dear. Well, enjoy your sudden retirement, old boy. Unfortunately, for Brennan and Comey and McCabe and Strzok and the others on this side of the Atlantic in the third week of January, it wasn't quite that simple. Because, instead of protecting Hillary, they were now protecting themselves - so it was necessary to dig in and double-down on the "Russia investigation".

Which sounds super-credible except for one small point: there was never a Russia investigation. As Andrew McCarthy sums it up:

Opening up a counterintelligence investigation against Russia is not the same thing as opening up a counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign.

Which is what they did - Brennan and Clapper and Comey and McCabe. They took tools designed to combat America's foreign enemies and used them against their own citizens and their political opposition. It was an intentional subversion of the electoral process conducted at the highest level by agencies with almost unlimited power.

---

LINK

quote:

---

is it accurate?

---

The info is accurate. Harper was paid by DOD to infiltrate Trump campaign. Evidence is there. Halper does not deny it. The whole Rushia collusion was an illusion created by 5 eyes and the US IC. Te evidence is everywhere.
MSM, CNN, MSNBC, et al followed the wrong story, and they led their viewers to believe the Trump colluded with Rushia fake news hoax.

Wow--this website has been buried on the internet because I've never seen this article before. Everything he said in 2018 thus far appears to be 100% correct. This is insanely scary.

The more I think about this article, the more it appears that the British Government is trying to control the United States' government, policy, and the citizens.

One has to really question whether the British spy activity along with their Commonwealth Realm underling Australia's work against Trump was done to push the US back into the control of the Commonwealth.

There seems to be a lot of policies that are in place in Great Britain which are being implemented in the US or proposed. Hell Great Britain may very well be the biggest threat to US Sovereignty.

I’ve always been vexed by Napolitano’s suspension and strange behavior after he returned to Fox. Here is what he said over two years ago now that led to his suspension.

quote:

---

In mid-March, on “Fox and Friends,” for example, Napolitano said he spoke with three sources in the field of intelligence who said Obama “went outside the chain of command” to conduct secret surveillance on Trump. Specifically, the judge said Obama went through Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters, GCHQ, to keep off “American fingerprints” from the surveillance operation.

---

quote:

---

“The question of whether former President Barack Obama actually spied on President Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign and transition has been tantalizing Washington since President Trump first made the allegation nearly two weeks ago. Since then, three investigations have been launched — one by the FBI, one by the House of Representatives and one by the Senate. Are the investigators chasing a phantom, or did this actually happen? … Sources have told me the that the British foreign surveillance service, the … GCHQ, most likely provided Obama with transcripts of Trump’s calls. … So by bypassing all American intelligence services, Obama would have had access to what he wanted with no Obama administration fingerprints.”

---

Was he on to something? Why did he return and never mention this again? Not only did he never mention it again you could make a case he changed his entire political view. He supported Mueller and attacked Trump frequently.

When he said this it was just a couple weeks after the infamous wiretap tweet from Trump. It seemed insane at the time and I guess that’s why he was suspended. Very odd.

quote:

---

Was he on to something? Why did he return and never mention this again? Not only did he never mention it again you could make a case he changed his entire political view. He supported Mueller and attacked Trump frequently. 

When he said this it was just a couple weeks after the infamous wiretap tweet from Trump. It seemed insane at the time and I guess that’s why he was suspended. Very odd. 

---

Blackmail is very effective.

Reading that was like listening to a Dan Bongino podcast over a year ago. It’s amazing that this is all just getting out.

The guy from Malta Mifsud told Papdopoulos he had information that the Russians had dirt on Hillary. Mifsud has worked for MI6. Papdopoulos told some foreign diplomats about Mifsud's comments. That supposedly was enough to start spying on Trump. British intelligence was part of the plot to set up minor people associated with the Trump Campaign and therefore justify the spying on Trump.