- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
States/counties that have mandated masks - is there data available to see if its slowing?
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:45 am
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:45 am
Which states have mandated mask wearing? As well as counties?
Do we have data to see if positive cases are slowing?
Doesn't California/ LA have mandatory masks? I don't think cases are dropping there.
Do we have data to see if positive cases are slowing?
Doesn't California/ LA have mandatory masks? I don't think cases are dropping there.
5
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:48 am to Magician2
quote:the folks in the Bay Area took the virus pretty serious from the jump and I have no doubt in my mind it has helped the spread in the area. San Francisco County and mist surrounding counties have had a drop in the bucket of what other densely populated areas around the country have seen
Doesn't California/ LA have mandatory masks? I don't think cases are dropping there.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:48 am to Magician2
Tokyo has used masks for generations ...they have plenty of data available to prove that masks slow or prevent the spread of disease.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:48 am to Magician2
70,000 new cases! That’s not good. There’s trouble in paradise.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:50 am to Magician2
quote:
Do we have data to see if positive cases are slowing?
That’s a really messy question- because communities that enact these rules are likely to engage in other fear based behaviors, that could limit their exposure.
No one has established that aerosol transmission is a dangerous vector either. We hypothesize it’s possible - but we haven’t established it.
I’m personally very skeptical. I don’t think the aerosol component is a major risk factor. Otherwise entire families would be getting sick at once. That’s not happening.
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 9:59 am
Posted on 7/11/20 at 9:54 am to Magician2
This is California, it is not slowing
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:06 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:They haven't established surface contact either.
No one has established that aerosol transmission is a dangerous vector either. We hypothesize it’s possible - but we haven’t established it.
We've got 10 gazillion vaccines and antidotes in the pipeline but no idea how the virus spreads.
We have all these precautions being mandated, but let's carve out a lil something for mayhem.
Headline: Cases Soar!
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:20 am to Sidicous
At first the virus would survive for days on surfaces, then it was the opposite.
These people are proposing interventions based on uninformed hunches.
These people are proposing interventions based on uninformed hunches.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:26 am to DarthRebel
I wonder what demographic isn’t listening at all
Really wonder
Really wonder
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News