- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Speaker schedules vote next week on Epstein files
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:03 am to Indefatigable
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:03 am to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s been a decade. If there was any there there, it would be out already. You’re falling for it.
Remember when the DOJ for years said there was no surveillance tape outside of Epstein’s cell because it wasn’t working that day. And then magically TEN YEARS LATER there actually is footage but some of it is missing.
And Kash Patel recently testified and it was so dodgy and evasive that you know he is 100% trying to prevent the files from being released.
AND if there is nothing there why was Boebert being pressured yesterday by Trump, Bondi, Trump, and Kash to remove her name from the discharge petition?!?
0
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:29 am to Indefatigable
quote:
There’s no way any intelligent person thinks you’re going to get anything more than what’s already known. At least not anything meaningful or actionable.
It’s been a decade. If there was any there there, it would be out already
I'm completely on board with everything being released and out in the open but I agree with you on this. If there was anything in there to sink anyone it would already have been used and if there ever was it's been scrubbed
quote:
Meanwhile, actual important things are being ignored and politicians are getting away with ignoring them because the public is talking about Epstein and H1B theater.
Yep
Posted on 11/13/25 at 6:16 am to TigerDoc
The (redacted) victim was a Trump employee, before Maxwell brought her to Epstein. She got the Trump job through her father, who also worked for Trump. Them spending time together is a nothingburger. Considering the VICTIM testified in court and wrote a book where she never saw Trump as being involved
And the part about Trump not barking is solely about Trump banning Epstein because of his inappropriate behavior. He cant believe that Trump hasnt stepped forward and told that story.
And Epstein being 75% there, means if Trump doesnt come forward then Epstein will be finally done with the mess. Because in 2011 he had just paid off all the lawsuits against him
There was no more action on Epstein/Maxwell until 2015, when the VICTIM herself, filed a lawsuit against them. She took Epstein fown 4 years after these emails
And the part about Trump not barking is solely about Trump banning Epstein because of his inappropriate behavior. He cant believe that Trump hasnt stepped forward and told that story.
And Epstein being 75% there, means if Trump doesnt come forward then Epstein will be finally done with the mess. Because in 2011 he had just paid off all the lawsuits against him
There was no more action on Epstein/Maxwell until 2015, when the VICTIM herself, filed a lawsuit against them. She took Epstein fown 4 years after these emails
Posted on 11/13/25 at 6:21 am to Lsu101205
quote:Irrelevant ... what did the Dems do?
He wasnt really trying to get a vote to the floor.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 6:24 am to Deuces
quote:
When it’s released and doesn’t show what many want, they will say it’s a conspiracy and Trump is withholding info.
This is exactly what the usual suspects will be saying
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News