Shocker. Biden interview scripted

Wow.. she is a brave Patriot for exposing this - but those paying attention already know this

When the person “in charge” is obviously mentally incompetent and is just the face the person/group of people who are really the ones making the decisions, there is zero accountability for the decisions that are made. There is no bigger “danger to democracy” than a faceless unaccountable entity calling the shots. How can Biden supporters not see this?

quote:

---

How can Biden supporters not see this?

---

They know it, but they don't care.

By Any Means Necessary

quote:

---

but clear enough to continue "running" the country.

---

Are there people that believe he is running anything. I don’t think so. I think everyone knows he isn’t but they don’t care. It’s scary and sad.

This will get swept under the rug or not covered at all, but it is really sickening the way the MSM protects this guy from any real scrutiny. There is a special place in hell for them.

Biden wasn’t subject to the presidential records act when he stole classified documents as a senator and vice president.

quote:

---

Biden wasn’t subject to the presidential records act when he stole classified documents as a senator and vice president.

---

Hence the violations of the PRA. I'm on the road until later this afternoon.

When I get back to my computer there are some excerpts from an excellent substack article that was just written about not only the presidential records Act but the 2014 Amendment to the PRA that Obama signed into law in 2014 that are exceptionally revealing with respect to how exactly who's saying made it more difficult for crimes committed by a sitting or former president could be revealed via exposure due to the PRA and the freedom of information Act.

quote:

---

some excerpts from an excellent substack article that was just written about not only the presidential records Act but the 2014 Amendment to the PRA that Obama signed into law in 2014 that are exceptionally revealing with respect to how exactly who's saying made it more difficult for crimes committed by a sitting or former president could be revealed via exposure due to the PRA and the freedom of information Act.

---

Nothing Is As It Appears - Joe Lange (Some of you will not agree with all of Joe's points or sources. I'd encourage you to over look what doesn't resonate with you and stick to the facts re: the Presidential Records Act).

quote:

---

There was an important law that was passed in 1978.
What was it?
According to the National Archives:

The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations.

Establishes public ownership of all Presidential records and defines the term Presidential records.

Requires that Vice-Presidential records be treated in the same way as Presidential records.

---

It's important to note that the VP records are included in the PRA, but not because the VP has the statutory authority to declassify documents, but rather that they are compelled by law to maintain proper security for those documents. I don't think anyone would attest that Joe's Delaware garage meets that threshold. Neither does the Penn Biden Center, rife with CCP assets throughout.

quote:

---

Don’t miss how important this law was.

It changed “legal ownership” of the official records of the President and Vice President from private to public. All official documents, even classified documents legally belong to the people. That law and the Freedom of Information Act are going to be enforced in the future in order to safeguard the power of the people. These two laws are also going to be used by Trump to expose their crimes.

The law also treated the Vice President’s documents in the same manner as the President’s.

That’s why Biden took his classified documents when he left office. He had lots of crimes to hide, too.

These documents of past presidential crimes are purposely classified as top secret or higher for the sole purpose of hiding their treason.

---

quote:

---

Do you know what’s in the Amendment that Obama signed into law?

According to Congress.gov:

Amends the Presidential Records Act to require the Archivist of the United States, upon determining to make publicly available any presidential record not previously made available, to: (1) promptly provide written notice of such determination to the former President during whose term of office the record was created, to the incumbent President, and to the public; and (2) make such record available to the public within 60 days, except any record with respect to which the Archivist receives notification from a former or incumbent President of a claim of constitutionally-based privilege against disclosure.

The amendment REQUIRED the Archivist to immediately inform the past president if their classified documents were going to be made public, along with the incumbent president. It also gave the past president or the incumbent president the option of denying the documents be made public by notifying the Archivist that they were claiming executive privilege. This is why Obama classified everything as top secret.

But there were two ways that the executive privilege could be overridden.

More from Congress.gov:

1) the incumbent President withdraws a decision upholding the claim, or (2) the Archivist is otherwise directed to do so by a final court order that is not subject to appeal.

An incumbent president can withdraw executive privilege, and a final court order by the Supreme Court can also override a claim of executive privilege.

Does that first override remind you of anything in the recent past?
Do you remember when Trump claimed Executive Privilege?
Was it a purposeful trap?
According to AP News:

It’s a risky move by President Joe Biden that could come back to haunt him — and future presidents — in the hyperpartisan world of Washington politics.

Democrat Biden has agreed to a request from Congress seeking sensitive information on the actions of his predecessor Donald Trump and his aides during the Jan. 6 insurrection, though the former president claims the information is guarded by executive privilege

Think Game Theory.
Is this going to haunt Biden and future presidents? More importantly, will it haunt past presidents like Obama, Bush and Clinton?


I would bet on it.
Biden as an incumbent president just set the precedent that past presidents’ classified documents can be made public by the incumbent president. Guess who is going to be the next incumbent president?

Trump already knows he’ll be president, and believe me, there is panic in DC.

---

quote:

---

“What is different regarding Obama’s presidential library?”

President Obama signed the Amendment to the Presidential Records Act in 2014, which would then directly affect who controlled his own presidential library. He was clearly trying to make it harder for the public to see his own crimes.

Part of the law prevents documents from being released until five years after the president has left office.

Do you think that prevented Trump from declassifying Obama’s documents? The president has the sole authority to declassify everything. But we are also at war, and these are “high crimes” of treason. Nothing prevented Trump from exposing his crimes.

Here’s two more “stupid” parts of that amendment, according to Congress.gov:

(Sec. 10) Prohibits an officer or employee of an executive agency from creating or sending a record using a non-official electronic messaging account unless such officer or employee: (1) copies an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee in the original creation or transmission of the record, or (2) forwards a complete copy of the record to an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee not later than 20 days after the original creation or transmission of the record.

Can you think of a high level government official who was sending communications through non-official electronic devices?

I bet you can.

---