- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/9/25 at 11:58 am to Bulldogblitz
You’re acting like I liked Biden or something LOL
Posted on 2/9/25 at 11:58 am to TigerCoon
Ouuuu burn
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:05 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
Ouuuu burn
gayer still
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:06 pm to TigerCoon
Real life lame I bet LMAO
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:09 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
You’re acting like I liked Biden or something LOL
Actually, you are acting like you ignore everything else not named trump.
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:13 pm to Bulldogblitz
He’s the president currently. He’s who we are talking about and has the attention. I don’t think Biden should’ve ever ran in 2020 much less 2024. Not a fan. In the slightest. However, if we are going to do this thing where we include presidents back to Clinton (even including bush), don’t exclude the first term of someone who you like. He gave more money to USAID. He could’ve did more work similar to DOGE first go round. How’s that crazy to point out
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:19 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
You looking at the Courts as being intrusive when their power is to examine if actions are abiding by the Law of the Land.
No way you posted that with a straight face. Using the highest court in the land as an example, the liberals on the supreme Court never, let me repeat, never break ranks. Why is that? That's called partisanship.
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:30 pm to dalefla
Neither do the conservatives lol I’m not understanding what was the point of that comment. You can predict which justices are going to vote which way about 95% of the time on the low end. That doesn’t negate what their constitutional powers are. Just skews when and where they will act (which I don’t agree with fwiw). Yall keep looking at it with this lens of purely liberals when they both act the same way, you just side with ones ideology more. Like think about, justices have lifetime appointments (or when they decide to leave) and they can get “gifts” (think it may be also be for some federal judges as well, still digging to be sure). How does that exactly make sense?
This post was edited on 2/9/25 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:34 pm to BlueTiger23
Never break ranks trollTiger23
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:35 pm to Jbird
I’ve already broke the matrix
Posted on 2/9/25 at 12:36 pm to BlueTiger23
quote:
I’ve already broke the matrix
Naw Posted on 2/9/25 at 1:12 pm to BlueTiger23
So Roberts didn't break ranks on Obamacare? Want more examples?
Posted on 2/9/25 at 1:31 pm to dalefla
A singular example can be rebutted with the YEARS of Clarence Thomas and Alito…. Pointing out the one time that someone does something doesn’t negate their trend of doing things. If a decision is pending, I’m willing to bet that sotomayor is going to take the liberal stance and Thomas the conservative. Also worth noting that even though he sides with the conservative side more than 50% of the time, CJ Roberts it’s the “least conservative” of the “conservative bloc” based on his sidings
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News