Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS led by Gorsuch rules for illegal immigrant

Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:24 pm to
Posted by dpier16
Member since Aug 2016
194 posts
Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:24 pm to
100% correct.

Was meaning that had it been one document and after the Cancelation of Removal w/ NTA— the rehearing judge would have determined removal/if removal was proper in relation to the cancelation of removal. In this case that he had the 10 years.
When trying to simplify one of the most complex parts of the law, things get lost in translation.
This post was edited on 4/29/21 at 8:26 pm
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6470 posts
Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:33 pm to
There are a lot of good men here that are Catholic, but... fellas, as long as the majority of the court is made up of Catholic and Jewish judges, this is what we're going to get when ruling on illegal aliens. Even conservative Catholics often feel bound by Catholic social teaching. The Catholic Church and Reform Judaism (comprising over 75% of American Jews) are both essentially open borders religions.

I'll guarantee you that every time a case is brought before SCOTUS on illegal alien children, the Amy Coney Barrett in particular is gonna fold like a wet napkin.

This country desperately needs some hard-assed Baptists and Calvinists on the Court to counter all the blood pouring from the hearts.
Posted by dpier16
Member since Aug 2016
194 posts
Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:43 pm to
This might be one of the worst "hot takes" I've seen on this site. And that's saying something.

Assuming religion of a Justice of the Supreme Court somehow caused he/she to rule a certain and disregarding the law/jurisprudence of the U.S. is foolish.

Also, that a certain other denomination/religion would better serve to protect/counter is also ludicrous. Just because you don't like/follow a certain denomination/religion doesn't dispossess another being able to serve the U.S.

Old saying goes, "Correlation doesn't equal Causation."
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49561 posts
Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

What about the word "ILLEGAL" don't people understand!


Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6470 posts
Posted on 4/29/21 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Assuming religion of a Justice of the Supreme Court somehow caused he/she to rule a certain and disregarding the law/jurisprudence of the U.S. is foolish.


If you're a faithful member of your religion, then it's probably the primary influence on your thinking. To say that it doesn't matter is like saying that gender is a social construct.
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 4/29/21 at 9:51 pm to
I know justices aren't supposed to be political, but at this point ACB has met the definition of RINO if she ever claimed to be Republican
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram