- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Brunson v. Adams hearing. 2020 election in front of the SCOTUS Jan 6th 2023
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
SCOTUS= Clarence Thomas
0
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:48 pm to Reservoir Ag
quote:
He said the foundation of the argument is that constitutionally, the government has a requirement to take 10 days to investigate fraudulent election claims.
I’m going to need to see the legal reasoning behind that.
Posted on 12/29/22 at 10:10 pm to texridder
quote:
The states had certified the results as per state law involving elections. Why/how does Congress have the duty and/or the authority to question the certified results of the election?
You mean they certified results that were produced/attained via voting machines w/o valid certification from a VSTL w/o valid accreditation?
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News