- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Romney's statement
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:19 pm to memphis tiger
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:19 pm to memphis tiger
Romney is a Yes vote.
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:20 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Wrong. I said it with Kav and I said it yesterday. Romney is a Yes vote. No doubt at all
I hope so. But I don’t trust him and won’t believe he is a yes vote until he actually does it.
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:30 pm to TigerFanatic99
Count him as a no.
Then, if he votes "yes" or abstains, it's lagniappe.
Then, if he votes "yes" or abstains, it's lagniappe.
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:36 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
My decision regarding a Supreme Court nomination is not the result of a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law, which in this case is the Constitution and precedent. The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.
The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.
somebody woke him up
this makes perfect logical sense
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News