- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Results of a 7-6 Supreme Court? (Or 8-5 with Roberts)
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:33 pm
What are some near givens that would be upheld when and if the Left has the majority on the Court?
2nd A: I’m sure they will uphold legislation supporting a retroactive criminalization of high capacity firearms and accessories. Will support high firearms and Ammo taxes thus making it hard for the common man to own a gun .
1st A: Hate crime legislation upheld? Jailing of conservatives and evangelicals?
Help me out here....
2nd A: I’m sure they will uphold legislation supporting a retroactive criminalization of high capacity firearms and accessories. Will support high firearms and Ammo taxes thus making it hard for the common man to own a gun .
1st A: Hate crime legislation upheld? Jailing of conservatives and evangelicals?
Help me out here....
11
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:35 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
No decision that had any legitimacy would come out of that court. People and states would just ignore it.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:35 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
Basically, your worst nightmares
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:39 pm to MMauler
quote:
No decision that had any legitimacy would come out of that court. People and states would just ignore it.
Gun wholesalers and manufacturers would?
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:40 pm to Kafka
quote:
Basically, your worst nightmares
I’m looking for some plausible scenarios?
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:43 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
I used to think "liberals are destroying America" was just hyperbole.
Now it's screaming at me... how could I have been so naive? They really are out to destroy the country in favor of their own interests
Now it's screaming at me... how could I have been so naive? They really are out to destroy the country in favor of their own interests
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:47 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
Conservative views will be criminalized as hate speech
The Fairness Doctrine will return, destroying conservative talk radio
Companies will be required to have black, woman, f@g, tranny board members (CA is already considering this; they may have passed it)
Obama's Section 8-ing of suburban America is being expedited now, this will be rubberstamped by a 13 member SC
etc...
The Fairness Doctrine will return, destroying conservative talk radio
Companies will be required to have black, woman, f@g, tranny board members (CA is already considering this; they may have passed it)
Obama's Section 8-ing of suburban America is being expedited now, this will be rubberstamped by a 13 member SC
etc...
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:50 pm to starkvingrad
I agree, but I really made the thread to get some of the posters to discuss what are some really bad things that can result from this planned packing.
Impact on Freedom of speech, assembly, religion, 2nd A, etc
Is it as big as we feel like it is or are we blowing it out of proportion ?
Impact on Freedom of speech, assembly, religion, 2nd A, etc
Is it as big as we feel like it is or are we blowing it out of proportion ?
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:51 pm to Kafka
quote:
Conservative views will be criminalized as hate speech
The Fairness Doctrine will return, destroying conservative talk radio
Companies will be required to have black, woman, f@g, tranny board members (CA is already considering this; they may have passed it)
Obama's Section 8-ing of suburban America is being expedited now, this will be rubberstamped by a 13 member SC
This is what I’m talking about.
What about 2nd A? Were my OP thoughts in the right ballpark?
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:54 pm to starkvingrad
quote:
Now it's screaming at me... how could I have been so naive?
I'm guessing you watch a lot of mainstream media.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 11:03 pm to MMauler
quote:
People and states would just ignore it.
The goalposts keep shifting
They won’t pack the court...
They won’t take our guns...
We won’t listen to them...
It’s happening. We keep moving the line in the sand because we don’t want to wake up and smell the roses, or in this case smell the shite.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 11:05 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
We keep moving the line in the sand because we don’t want to wake up and smell the roses, or in this case smell the shite.
Yep, we’ve passed the point of remedy the founders spoke about in the DOI. Sadly, we (or enough of us) won’t fight back until the economy has crashed because we’re too comfortable.
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:41 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
Gun wholesalers and manufacturers would?
Just like there are states that are passing laws to ignore Dementia Joe's executive orders, I believe that there will be states that pass laws to ignore any ruling that comes from such a politicized, biased, and FRAUDULENT Supreme Court.
Will gun manufacturers relocate to those states?
Perhaps.
Will the citizens just give up their rights and recognize these fraudulent decisions coming from the politicized FILTH that would comprise this FRAUDULENT court?
No. The bloodshed caused by judicially eliminating the Second Amendment would be immense. And, YES, I think many states would stand up to a politically packed Supreme Court on that issue and many others.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:47 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
the end of citizens united 5 to 4 that companies are people in some law so no distinction possible in election law, ie the one you show ID to do.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:49 am to CelticDog
MelticDog stroking this morning.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:51 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
it has been said there are many hot button issues Roberts has put on the back burner.
he has most likely been instructed to wait for Obama and the radical black judges coming soon.
he has most likely been instructed to wait for Obama and the radical black judges coming soon.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:54 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
Civil War
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:55 am to cajunangelle
quote:
it has been said there are many hot button issues Roberts has put on the back burner.
Cite cases for those who can't do the research?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:55 am to udtiger
That dog will hunt
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:55 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
Our 1A, which is the only true free speech right in the world, will turn into the UKs version.
quote:
“may be subject to formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society”.
quote:
“threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour that causes, or is likely to cause, another person harassment, alarm or distress”. This law has been revised over the years to include language that is deemed to incite “racial and religious hatred”, as well as “hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation” and language that “encourages terrorism”.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News