- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember when just the swing states simultaneously went to take a smoke break in 2020?
Posted on 9/9/23 at 5:16 pm to tango029
Posted on 9/9/23 at 5:16 pm to tango029
Not this phag again...
You idiot, you prove my point! Trump took ALL those Bell Weather counties that Hilary won and FOUR more and LOST???
Those are BLUE states, not BATTLEGROUND!
No unless it's a graveyard. That's 100% Democrat. The Heartland voted for Trump. You and your urban ilk love you some pedophilia.
quote:
Trump lost 14 Bellwhethers to Hillary in 2016.
You idiot, you prove my point! Trump took ALL those Bell Weather counties that Hilary won and FOUR more and LOST???
quote:
Like Obama, Hillary won Nevada, Virginia and Colorado.
Those are BLUE states, not BATTLEGROUND!
quote:
Land still doesn't vote.
No unless it's a graveyard. That's 100% Democrat. The Heartland voted for Trump. You and your urban ilk love you some pedophilia.
1
Posted on 9/9/23 at 5:16 pm to doubleb
quote:
Show me the millions of fraudulent votes that he received. You aren’t going to.
Show me the millions of legit votes that he received.
You wouldn't.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 5:24 pm to Bayoubred
quote:
Not this phag again...
So creative, let's have some fun though since your clearly triggered.
quote:
You idiot, you prove my point! Trump took ALL those Bell Weather counties that Hilary won and FOUR more and LOST???
Are you fricking retarded? Once they are lost they are no longer bellwhethers and Trump didn't win all of them in 2020 anyways, holy frick you just make shite up as you go.
quote:
Those are BLUE states, not BATTLEGROUND!
Battlegrounds like Iowa and Ohio? Try not to look too dumb here when getting to retort it's just embarrassing. Are you chewing lead paint chips?
quote:
No unless it's a graveyard. That's 100% Democrat. The Heartland voted for Trump. You and your urban ilk love you some pedophilia.
And yet land still does not vote. Sorry if that triggers you man, you seem pretty pissed right now, maybe take a break from fricking your sister, and go help your mom with the dishes.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 5:33 pm to CelticDog
quote:
2020
168.31m registered voters
155.4 voted
92% registered voter turnout
66.8% voter eligible turnout
158,383,403 voted.
federal election commission
www.fec.gov
Why do you idiots insist on citing these numbers that are based on the very point of contention?
We don't accept those numbers.
We don't accept their legitimacy.
We don't accept how they were "legitimized".
We don't accept being told what to accept without being shown why we should accept it.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 5:41 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
Why do you idiots insist on citing these numbers that are based on the very point of contention?
We don't accept those numbers.
We don't accept their legitimacy.
We don't accept how they were "legitimized".
We don't accept being told what to accept without being shown why we should accept it.
What numbers should I use to compare 2020 to 2016 then genius?
This post was edited on 9/9/23 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 9/9/23 at 6:03 pm to tango029
quote:the number of dems to eliminate to get the rights of representative government restored to all Americans
What numbers should I use to compare 2020 to 2016 then genius?
wait since that would leave a bad taste how about the number of states to declare independence in national divorce
Posted on 9/9/23 at 6:06 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
the number of dems to eliminate to get the rights of representative government restored to all Americans
wait since that would leave a bad taste how about the number of states to declare independence in national divorce
When your ideas have the majority of votes you can do just that. Until then, you'll just have to suck it up or leave. Or you can entertain us all and do something stupid on TV. :)
Posted on 9/9/23 at 6:10 pm to tango029
quote:YOUR IDEAS do NOT have the majority of actual votes
When your ideas have the majority of votes you can do just that. Until then, you'll just have to suck it up or leave. Or you can entertain us all and do something stupid on TV. :)
You had better pay close attention to your wretched suggestion that those WITH such a majority get to control the others
especially in the contentious environment of complete and total disagreement, "Mr genius"
Posted on 9/9/23 at 6:13 pm to tango029
quote:
What numbers should I use to compare 2020 to 2016 then genius?
Comparing fraudulent numbers is pointless. The dims cheated in 2016 but didn't cheat enough.
They changed everything so that they could generate whatever votes they needed AFTER the polls closed.
But you know that. Everyone with half a brain knows it. You are just afraid to say it outloud.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 6:21 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Comparing fraudulent numbers is pointless. The dims cheated in 2016 but didn't cheat enough.
They changed everything so that they could generate whatever votes they needed AFTER the polls closed.
But you know that. Everyone with half a brain knows it. You are just afraid to say it outloud.
So one of you says the numbers have to be fraudulent because of voter turnout, then you and the other guy say you can't use those numbers to prove the other guy is wrong.
You guys have literally setup a scenario where nothing can ever be proven.
Why even bother bullshitting each other with reasons, it's clear you don't like the results so this childish they're all fake crap evolved out of it.
Sad really, when I was growing up we manned up to our losses and failures. This generation just seems like a bunch of spineless pussies who want to cry about it 3 fricking years.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 8:28 pm to tango029
quote:(1) Hillary garnered more votes than Trump, nitwit. One would expect a split.
A total of 35 counties voted for the winner of each presidential election from 1980 through 2012.
(2) The observation is that 19 counties (not 35) voted for the POTUS election winner for 10 straight cycles. They got it right ... every ... single ... time. Over a 40yr span, they never missed.
(3) Suddenly, 18 of the 19 got it wrong. That is an anomalous result.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 8:35 pm to tango029
quote:The irony of that statement is thick. Tossing solid cases out for "no standing" literally sets up a scenario where nothing can ever be proven.
You guys have literally setup a scenario where nothing can ever be proven.
Then, suddenly, 2 1/2 yrs later, state supreme courts say "Whoooopsy doodle! Our bad! State residents with complaints about state-run elections actually do have standing." But gosh! It seems memories have now faded and the opportunity for remedy has passed. Oh well.
Posted on 9/9/23 at 8:45 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
1) Hillary garnered more votes than Trump, nitwit. One would expect a split.
(2) The observation is that 19 counties (not 35) voted for the POTUS election winner for 10 straight cycles. They got it right ... every ... single ... time. Over a 40yr span, they never missed.
(3) Suddenly, 18 of the 19 got it wrong. That is an anomalous result.
Hillary got more votes so you should expect 16 of the bellwhethers to be wrong? Huh. That literally makes no sense. They're bellwhethers specifically because they don't get it wrong.
In 2016, 16 of the 35 bellwhethers got it wrong, leaving 19 remaining for the 2020 election. So if you believe 18 getting it wrong is fraud, and don't believe 16 getting it wrong isn't then you're just being a partisan.
The reality is the bellwhethers were stable because there two parties were stable. Trump shifted the demographics of the Democrats and Republicans which is why all the bellwhethers started to fall.
But yeah 18 bellwhethers falling = fraud but 16 falling is totally legit man!
Posted on 9/9/23 at 8:54 pm to tango029
quote:No nitwit, in an election that supposedly wasn't even close ... 81 Million votes* ... for 18 of 19 bellwethers (who've gotten it right everytime over a 40yr span) to suddenly all miss in unison is a totally different animal.
In 2016, 16 of the 35 bellwhethers got it wrong, leaving 19 remaining for the 2020 election. So if you believe 18 getting it wrong is fraud, and don't believe 16 getting it wrong isn't then you're just being a partisan.
Your refusal to acknowledge the anomaly is the partisan indicator.
This post was edited on 9/10/23 at 5:07 am
Posted on 9/9/23 at 9:05 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
No nitwit, in an election that supposedly wasn't even close ... 81 Million votes* ... for 18 of 19 bellweathers (who've gotten it right everytime over a 40yr span) to suddenly all miss in unison is a totally different animal.
Your refusal to acknowledge the anomaly is the partisan indicator.
Let me explain this to you like you're retarded.
There were 35 bellwhethers before the 2016 election. 16 of then voted for Hillary.
Of the 19 remaining in 2020, 18 voted for Trump.
So if you believe a large amount of bellwhethers flipping is fraud then you must equally believe 2016 was fraudulent. But you are so focused on the last 18 falling that you are absolutely igniting the first 16 falling.
Or your just an idiot with partisan blunders on. Muh 18 bellwhethers!
Posted on 9/9/23 at 9:08 pm to tango029
NC_Tigah, Doc, we have full blown communist views with this tango character
Posted on 9/9/23 at 9:47 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
NC_Tigah, Doc, we have full blown communist views with this tango character
Insults fail, then threats fail. Your next go to is, you're a communist? What are you like 12?
Posted on 9/10/23 at 5:25 am to tango029
quote:Repeating yourself is effective if your previous point was solid. Yours wasn't. It was disassembled once. I'll do it again. But your choice of invectives is entertaining, nitwit.
Let me explain this to you like you're retarded.
Again, the odds that a small percentage of bellwethers get it wrong in a given election are pretty good. It happens.
So if we were talking about 3, 4, or 5 of the 19 bellwether counties selecting Trump over Biden in 2020, you'd have a solid point. Instead, 18 of 19 did. Further, had Trump garnered more *votes* than Biden in 2020, those bellwether misses might even have approached 40% ... as they did for Hillary in 2016.
However, Biden supposedly won the election comfortably. So the odds that 18 of 19 got it exactly wrong, all at once, are astronomically low.
Let's define "astronomically low."
Outside of the 2020 "anomaly", 95% of 40-yr perfect bellwethers suddenly missing is something which likely has not occurred in the history of the planet.
Got it?
This post was edited on 9/10/23 at 5:34 am
Posted on 9/10/23 at 5:41 am to tango029
quote:
NC_Tigah, Doc, we have full blown communist views with this tango character
Insults fail, then threats fail. Your next go to is, you're a communist? What are you like 12?
Since you have communist views, why did you say being called a communist an insult?
Page 18 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News