Reddit CFB fans meltdown on Trump

Guy wants unbiased news sources to get into politics

Answer?

quote:

---

BBC, NY Times, WSJ, Washington Post, the Economist, Boston Herald.

Actual newspapers with print circulation in general tend to be worthwhile. There are think tanks as well if you want to get into the technical details. All the think tanks are partisan/have an agenda but some of them are definitely worthwhile and put out quality materials. I tend to suggest looking for high quality rather than non-partisan.

---

Reddit is super duper liberal. More liberal than this board is conservative.

quote:

---

Guy wants unbiased news sources to get into politics

---

quote:

---

WSJ

---

About as unbiased as you can find these days. BBC is kinda unbiased, but certainly biased if anything could impact GB.

Not sure about the Boston Herald though.

WP and NYT are most assuredly biased.

quote:

---

Reddit is super duper liberal.

---

What?

Reddit is just a massive glob of people. You're looking in the wrong places if you think it's mostly liberal.

This thread literally proves my point

I was in a reddit thread the other days where liberals were talking about a need for civil discussion in this country. Well, at least a couple of them were...

quote:

---

We didn't stop having civil arguments because the left wing became uncivil shite-throwers.
We are here because the right-wing has collectively lost its sense of objective reality. To be conservative, to be right-wing in this country is to deny the idea that truth is knowable.
The idea that global warming is a hoax is THE ACCEPTED, MAINSTREAM position of the right. That disqualifies them at every level from even reaching the level of conversation. Only fringe groups even believe in kindergarten level science. You can't make a reasonable argument against that.
You cannot reason a person out of an opinion they didn't reason themselves into. The entire conservative base is lost. They cannot be saved, just overpowered.
When one group believes in an entirely different set of facts, you can't reconcile that with conversation. And I shouldn't even say "believe" because it puts it in their language. Facts are knowable, and your belief in or against them makes no difference.
They believe Obama was not born in this country. They believe Hillary ran a satanic cult. They believe trickle down economics work. They believe our economy was worse under Obama than under Bush.
This isn't a small number of people, this isn't a crazy fringe. This is 45% of the country. They have a collective paranoia and delusion that respects nothing but strength and power, and if you deal with them in a civil manner they will gladly break the laws and traditions of this country to cut you down.

---