RE: Trump 's Media Ban; If CNN & Nick Shirley Gave Opposite Details of the Same Incident..

Here's the hypothetical: CNN and independent journalist Nick Shirley investigate a certain situation and give completely divergent information regarding what actually happened. My question is:

Before you have a chance to do any research of your own, would you be more inclined to believe Nick Shirley or CNN?





PS - I'll go first. I already believe practically nothing that the corrupt, bought-and-paid-for corporate media spews forth on a daily basis. On the other hand, Nick Shirley has already proven himself to have done an excellent job exposing fraud in places like Minnesota and California. So much so, in fact, that the state of California introduced legislation aimed at keeping Shirley out of their state.

For me, this is a no-brainer. I would honestly believe Nick Shirley's findings over anything reported by CNN. Every single day and twice on Sunday.