- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rally Against Nuclear War Going on at the White House
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:13 pm to REG861
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:13 pm to REG861
It really is amazing how many people can blithely discuss dropping a nuclear weapon on a country with which we are not at war. If Trump thinks North Korea is a specific and actual threat, have Congress declare war in the only manner prescribed by our Constitution. Undeclared wars waged by the Executive Branch are fundamentally inconsistent with the principles of limited government.
2
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:14 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
It really is amazing how many people can blithely discuss dropping a nuclear weapon on a country with which we are not at war.
Someone said earlier we are still at war with them. Nothing was ever signed and trump does not need any approval
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:15 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
It really is amazing how many people can blithely discuss dropping a nuclear weapon on a country with which we are not at war. If Trump thinks North Korea is a specific and actual threat, have Congress declare war in the only manner prescribed by our Constitution. Undeclared wars waged by the Executive Branch are fundamentally inconsistent with the principles of limited government.
As I stated in in a thread earlier. He doesn't need congressional approval. We are technically still in a state of war with DPRK.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:18 pm to cardswinagain
quote:
War should always be a last resort
So, generally that is a obligatory nice thing to say, but:
1) We did that in WWII and what happened there?
2) We missed opportunities to get BinLaden and what happened? I know not a war, but a "kind" deferral that bit us in the arse big time.
3) Might add Cuba in there too just for kicks...we turned it over to volunteer rebels and the Cuban people lived in Communist exile for the next 65 yrs...oh, and wait they still do.
It's an easy thing to say, but not always the best selection, at least that's where I stand.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:19 pm to TigerB8
quote:
Why do these fricks think everything's Trumps fault? Do they not know that NK has been "spoken to" for decades? Do they not know that they have threatened the US repeatedly for no cause lately? These people seem to have no life but resisting and protesting. They need to get a nuke shoved up their a$$e$
We can respond via military force without resorting to nuclear weapons. I'm not sure you or these protesters can appreciate the difference
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:20 pm to larry289
quote:
1) We did that in WWII and what happened there?
Sucks for them, but we do not have to be the world's policemen.
quote:
3) Might add Cuba in there too just for kicks...we turned it over to volunteer rebels and the Cuban people lived in Communist exile for the next 65 yrs...oh, and wait they still do.
Yet again, what do we owe the Cuban people? What over there is worth having Americans die?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:23 pm to Jcorye1
I'm a Pro Atomic Bomb and Anti-nuclear war.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:25 pm to GEAUXmedic
Where were these people while North Korea was developing a nuclear arsenal?
No nukes, no nuclear war
No nukes, no nuclear war
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:25 pm to REG861
quote:
REG861
Ok professor, show me proof where anyone but Kim Jong fat boy is talking about nukes?
I'm tired of people shifting on the president when he's standing up for the country after being threatened with nukes. Do you honestly think "talks" have not been tried yet? Do you know how long that country has been under sanctions but still propped up by china who laughs while enjoying the show?
Trump can lay waste to that shite hole without nukes so don't you condescend me like your u know who I am.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:27 pm to TigerB8
I'm not shitting on trump, some degree of military force is looking more and more inevitable and I blame North Korea. That doesn't mean I want to see nuclear war, which is hard for some of the chicken hawks here to understand.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:28 pm to Fireman17
quote:
. Nuke their butt
You first hero
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:29 pm to GEAUXmedic
the roll call of useful idiots
Who the frick do they think is "for" nuclear war?
Who the frick do they think is "for" nuclear war?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:29 pm to GEAUXmedic
They should be at the DPRK Embassy
This post was edited on 8/9/17 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:30 pm to GEAUXmedic
Congress never declared war against North Korea to begin with. We entered the war pursuant to UN resolution. It's precisely why old-right, conservative Republicans like Robert Taft and Howard Buffett opposed the conflict in Korea. You know, when Republicans had principles and conservatism actually meant following the Constitution, regardless of how difficult it may be.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:30 pm to GEAUXmedic
These people are afraid of another Iraq.
Don't worry... if we go to war with the Norks it will be over before CNN can even report on it.
Don't worry... if we go to war with the Norks it will be over before CNN can even report on it.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:31 pm to GEAUXmedic
Oh look, Code Pink decided to fire up the war outrage machine after taking off the last 8 years.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:31 pm to REG861
quote:
We can respond via military force without resorting to nuclear weapons. I'm not sure you or these protesters can appreciate the difference
Obviously. I think everyone knows the difference
All of that is dependent on how capable you let North Korea become. No one here and no one protesting knows the exact odds of intercept or if we know the exact location of every single mobile launch system
Conventional means would have been a no brainer for the last few decades, and may or may not be for a little longer.
This post was edited on 8/9/17 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:31 pm to GEAUXmedic
Pussies
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:31 pm to udtiger
quote:
They should be at the DPRK Embassy
Closest one is in Cuba.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 7:31 pm to GEAUXmedic
You think any of them would stand on the font line and defend this country?
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News