- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Putin Orders Third Troop Expansion Of War, Making Army 2nd Largest After China's
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:00 pm to OBReb6
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:00 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Backed Chechen rebels
Blew up nordstream pipeline (partially Russia’s asset)
Kosovo was about taking out a Russian ally, and pushing our sphere of influence further east.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:01 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:you sure seem to love Russia for some reason. What's up with that? Are you from Russia?
You think you are clever saying this tired line. But you look extremely simple and stupid.
Whats really sad is that Nato can turn the entire country of Ukraine into its proxy army and still manage to lose more land. pathetic.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:11 pm to narddogg81
Maybe he’s just tired of the dollar continuing to lose value, and our international security deteriorating
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:19 pm to narddogg81
quote:
the thing is, putin doesnt get to tell other countries where they can setup military bases, especially when his sad sack military cant even defeat a country like ukraine
Putin never did and doesn't now, want to take all of Ukraine. I'm sure he feels the same about who, what, and where military bases or action can be carried out! Lol
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:26 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Putin never did and doesn't now, want to take all of Ukraine.
Lol. Like you or anybody not named Putin knows what he wants. He lies so often, he probably doesn't know himself.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:31 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Backed Chechen rebels
We sent NATO troops to aid the Chechens? In which conflict?
quote:
Blew up nordstream pipeline
Even assuming this is true, this was after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. We were discussing pre-invasion aggression (Reference "what led to this", implying pre-invasion)
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:32 pm to BayouBlitz
Who doesn’t lie? Our government openly blamed him for the 2016 election and it was bogus. Does he lie more than they do?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:34 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Kosovo was about taking out a Russian ally
Kosovo was a UN operation, which Russia had the ability to veto and did not.
NATO was secondary to the UNSC resolutions, which, again, Russia did not veto.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:35 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Maybe he’s just tired of the dollar continuing to lose value
a. Has almost 0 to do with the response of the invasion of Ukraine
b. A chaotic global economy will hurt the US economy and dollar even more.
quote:
and our international security deteriorating
Not occurring, currently.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
They didn't initially understand what we were doing, they were naive
This post was edited on 9/17/24 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:39 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Does he lie more than they do?
Deflection. We are talking about Putin and the shitshow he has caused.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
If covert ops and intel warfare doesn’t matter then I just don’t know what to say to you. Aggression is never warranted or understandable unless directly attacked? I wish we lived by that principle.
If y’all are going to ignore NATO expansion being the wedge issue then I just don’t know what to tell you. Do you think William Burns is an idiot? He’s fallen upwards all the way to the CIA directorship
If y’all are going to ignore NATO expansion being the wedge issue then I just don’t know what to tell you. Do you think William Burns is an idiot? He’s fallen upwards all the way to the CIA directorship
This post was edited on 9/17/24 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not occurring, currently.
Constantly badgering the largest nuclear power in the world and escalating our rhetoric and our authorization of Ukrainian missile strikes sure isn’t helping things.
But I guess it’s not “currently” until the bombs detonate? When have we been in a more precarious situation with nuclear war since 1963?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:44 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
They didn't initially understand what we were doing
It's not some conspiracy theory.
quote:
they were naive
No. They were trying to move into the modern world and be part of the new emerging global landscape, at that point. As Putin and the oligarchs gains autocratic/oligarchic power over the country, they rejected integration with modernity out of some belief that they could create a kleptocratic state that could compete (Update: they could not, but they all got rich as shite).
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:46 pm to OBReb6
quote:
If y’all are going to ignore NATO expansion being the wedge issue then I just don’t know what to tell you.
If you can explain what NATO had to do with the 2014 Russian interference with Ukraine's integration with the EU, which led to the Maidan revolution in response, I'll listen.
They didn't seem too focused or concerned about NATO when they started this mess in 2014.
quote:
If covert ops and intel warfare doesn’t matter then I just don’t know what to say to you.
Is this about Chechnya? What cover ops were involved? From a legitimate source. This is the literal first time I'm hearing of this.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:48 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Deflection. We are talking about Putin and the shitshow he has caused.
Hmm, let’s summon someone more qualified than myself
quote:
Ukraine and Georgia's NATO aspirations not only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region. Not only does Russia perceive encirclement, and efforts to undermine Russia's influence in the region, but it also fears unpredictable and uncontrolled consequences which would seriously affect Russian security interests. Experts tell us that Russia is particularly worried that the strong divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership, with much of the ethnic-Russian community against membership, could lead to a major split, involving violence or at worst, civil war. In that eventuality, Russia would have to decide whether to intervene; a decision Russia does not want to have to face.
William Burns, US ambassador to Russia, 2008
LINK
If you have full knowledge that X action will cause Y outcome ahead of time, and you do it anyway, can you actually blame it on someone other than yourself unless you’re just a psychopath?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:49 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Constantly badgering the largest nuclear power in the world and escalating our rhetoric and our authorization of Ukrainian missile strikes sure isn’t helping things.
Again, this is due directly to Russia's invasion.
You're effectively arguing Russia can wantonly invade countries and use its nuke to silence any opposition, and then claim this subservience is helping our international security.
quote:
But I guess it’s not “currently” until the bombs detonate?
By this logic, Russia can literally do anything it wants.
As I said earlier, the only reason Russia is relevant today is b/c it has nukes. There is nothing else.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:50 pm to OBReb6
quote:
If you have full knowledge that X action will cause Y outcome ahead of time, and you do it anyway,
Ukraine is not part of NATO.
Ukraine never even applied to be part of NATO until this invasion.
"X action" never occurred.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're effectively arguing Russia can wantonly invade countries and use its nuke to silence any opposition, and then claim this subservience is helping our international security.
Who broke the agreement and expanded NATO more eastward, moving it onto Russia's doorstep?
Who overthrew the Ukraine government and installed Zelensky?
Who put biolabs and CIA bases in Eastern Ukraine?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 3:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you can explain what NATO had to do with the 2014 Russian interference with Ukraine's integration with the EU, which led to the Maidan revolution in response, I'll listen.
I’ll just post another paragraph from the same cable
quote:
4. (U) During a press briefing January 22 in response to a question about Ukraine's request for a MAP, the MFA said "a radical new expansion of NATO may bring about a serious political-military shift that will inevitably affect the security interests of Russia." The spokesman went on to stress that Russia was bound with Ukraine by bilateral obligations set forth in the 1997 Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership in which both parties undertook to "refrain from participation in or support of any actions capable of prejudicing the security of the other Side." The spokesman noted that Ukraine's "likely integration into NATO would seriously complicate the many-sided Russian-Ukrainian relations," and that Russia would "have to take appropriate measures." The spokesman added that "one has the impression that the present Ukrainian leadership regards rapprochement with NATO largely as an alternative to good-neighborly ties with the Russian Federation."
Popular
Back to top


1



