Started By
Message

re: Proof That Democrats Have Raised the White Flag of Surrender on Gun Control

Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:48 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:48 pm to

quote:

I didn't realize that Bloomberg's Republicanism was such a sensitive issue for you folks.
Would you not take umbrage if someone called Rick Santorum a liberal democrat?

Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32883 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

He's pro-choice, he's pro-gay marriage, he supports at least a few gun control measures, and is in favor of a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.


There are some Republicans who identify with the party strictly for fiscal reasons. Items you listed above as reasons to disqualify him as a Republican are a big reason why many Republicans are now identifying as Independents.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Would you not take umbrage if someone called Rick Santorum a liberal democrat?

Not if he was elected as a Democrat. For the record, I don't put much stock in party labels which is why I'm amused by folks that do.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Not if he was elected as a Democrat.


quote:

For the record, I don't put much stock in party labels which is why I'm amused by folks that do.
It has nothing to do with labels. It has to do with behavior. Bloomy doesn't behave anything like a Republican would be expected to.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Bloomy doesn't behave anything like a Republican would be expected to.

That may be true, but he also doesn't behave like a Democrat which is why he knew he could never win the Democratic nomination in NYC.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

That may be true, but he also doesn't behave like a Democrat
He got elected precisely because he behaves like a democrat.

quote:

which is why he knew he could never win the Democratic nomination in NYC.
Yeah. Sure. New Yorkers would never elect a democrat *cough*deblasio*cough*.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 12:07 am to
Do you realize how nonsensical your post is? You're conflating winning nominations with winning the general. DeBlasio did something that Bloomberg knew he could never do, which is win the Democratic nomination. Conversely, Bloomberg did something DeBlasio could never do, which is win the Republican nomination.
This post was edited on 4/2/14 at 12:10 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 12:28 am to
quote:

Do you realize how nonsensical your post is?


quote:

You're conflating winning nominations with winning the general. DeBlasio did something that Bloomberg knew he could never do, which is win the Democratic nomination. Conversely, Bloomberg did something DeBlasio could never do, which is win the Republican nomination.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69071 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 2:20 am to
quote:

I don't think you know what they're "scared of".


c'mon. Are you saying there wasn't a mass hysteria and a run on guns and ammo? What did they fear?

"Barry gunna take r guns"
Posted by Navtiger1
Washington
Member since Aug 2007
3368 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 2:50 am to
quote:

c'mon. Are you saying there wasn't a mass hysteria and a run on guns and ammo? What did they fear?

"Barry gunna take r guns"


Unfortunately this was a big fear of a lot of dumb asses! And now ammo is expensive and hard to come by and gun prices have gone up! Luckily shite has started to calm down!
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 5:26 am to
They will never stop, they will suffer the setback and try, try again.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 5:35 am to
quote:

c'mon. Are you saying there wasn't a mass hysteria and a run on guns and ammo? What did they fear?

"Barry gunna take r guns"


Fear of the raging rampant stupidity of the left side of the political equation is no vice.

They deserve contempt and scorn but there are so many of them and they breed like rabbits and they believe simple majorities settle matters of fact.
Posted by LSU_Cubs
NW Burbs
Member since Jul 2012
372 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 5:57 am to
Good, maybe now I can stop seeing those stupid "THEY GUNNA TAKE R GUNS IMPEACH" memes on facebook

Oh, and

2,1
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 7:50 am to
How long after winning as a Republican did it take him to come out of the Independent closet?
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7137 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 10:05 am to

No ear or eye protection. Stupid.

Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 11:25 am to
quote:

c'mon. Are you saying there wasn't a mass hysteria and a run on guns and ammo? What did they fear? "Barry gunna take r guns"

You are implying that the fears were unfounded because the attempts were unsuccessful?
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Bloomberg is one guy who can truly and accurately be called a RINO.

This is really curious in American politics.

Apparently the Republican party requires someone to pass ALL tests to be considered a party member, one failed test and they're labeled a liberal.

Is this the same for Democrats? If someone doesn't pass one test, are they labeled a conservative?

Example: James Brady is registered as a Republican, but due to his stand on gun control, he is a liberal (RINO). If you don't exhibit ALL attributes of a conservative, you are not a true Republican.

Ted Kennedy was against abortion, therefore one would conclude the Democrats would label him a conservative (DINO). Ted Kennedy was NEVER considered anything but a staunch, liberal Democrat. If you exhibit ONE attribute of a liberal, you are a Democrat.

It seems to me the test for R is exclusive, while the test for D is inclusive. Does anyone else see that?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Ted Kennedy was against abortion, therefore one would conclude the Democrats would label him a conservative (DINO). Ted Kennedy was NEVER considered anything but a staunch, liberal Democrat. If you exhibit ONE attribute of a liberal, you are a Democrat.

Bob Casey is also anti-abortion but got reelected without being primaried, not to mention the dozens of pro-gun Democrats in Congress, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

not to mention the dozens of pro-gun Democrats in Congress, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Exactly. Being pro-gun doesn't exclude one from the Democratic party, but being anti-gun DOES exclude one from the Republican party.

It's as if there's the Party of Ideological Purity, and then there's everyone else.

Why is this?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

It's as if there's the Party of Ideological Purity, and then there's everyone else.


You can exactly flip the parties on abortion, WT - there are a lot more RINOs, then blue dogs - I can tell you that.

Outside the deep south, blue dogs are virtually extinct. Heck, RINOs are everywhere - running the national party, leading the Senate Minority Caucus and sitting in the House Speaker's chair.
This post was edited on 4/2/14 at 1:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram