- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: People who hate Trump will believe anything
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
defending or deflecting for democrats.
I don't do either
You constantly... daily ... do both on here. STFU liar.
2
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:28 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
But they think they are winning, because their buddies cheer for them.
Okay, F@ggieHank.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:29 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
You constantly... daily ... do both on here.
Naw. This is just a meme created by dumb and/or crazy people who are bad at rhetoric and comprehension.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:29 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
And they prove it by calling you a leftist for not agreeing with every single thing he does and says.
No, we call you TDS nerds "leftists," when you skyscream, cry and disagree with EVERYTHING he does and says.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:30 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
STFU liar.
One of the biggest pathological liars on this board telling others to stop "lying" Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:30 am to RogerTheShrubber
He's VERY emotional this morning.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't even know what "lawfare" is to deny it exists
You're such a liar.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:31 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Anything?
Do they believe a virgin gave birth....to some dude who was murdered and came back to life....and lives in the clouds forever with his Dad?
I never realized what a shitty human being you are.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:32 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
One of the biggest pathological liars on this board telling others to stop "lying"
Such gold coming from you and back by SFP
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He's VERY emotional this morning.
He gets more frustrated as it goes along. Soon he will accuse you of sleeping with kids.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 9:35 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
You asked for a definition. I gave you a literal one without any bullshite. You chose to deflect away from answering the question you posed . That’s on you, my guy.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
It's a pretty easy definition... filing and weaponizing lawsuits against a political enemy.
How do you claim to not realize this exists?
AI Overview:
Lawfare is the strategic use of law, legal systems, and institutions as a weapon or tool to achieve military, political, or strategic objectives, often as a substitute for or adjunct to traditional warfare, aiming to damage or delegitimize opponents, control territory, or influence public opinion. It involves manipulating legal frameworks for advantage, such as using lawsuits to drain resources, filing war crimes claims to hinder operations, or shaping narratives to gain international support, and can be employed by state and non-state actors.
Key Aspects of Lawfare:
Strategic Weaponization: Using legal processes (litigation, international courts, regulations) to gain an edge, similar to kinetic warfare but with legal tools.
Delegitimization: Aiming to portray an adversary's actions as illegal or illegitimate, eroding their support.
Resource Drain: Wasting an opponent's time, money, and energy through prolonged legal battles (e.g., SLAPP suits, strategic litigation).
Operational Constraints: Creating legal dilemmas or constraints that limit an adversary's freedom of action, especially in counter-terrorism or conflict zones.
Broad Application: Extends beyond military conflict to influence foreign policy, media, domestic politics, and civil society.
How do you claim to not realize this exists?
AI Overview:
Lawfare is the strategic use of law, legal systems, and institutions as a weapon or tool to achieve military, political, or strategic objectives, often as a substitute for or adjunct to traditional warfare, aiming to damage or delegitimize opponents, control territory, or influence public opinion. It involves manipulating legal frameworks for advantage, such as using lawsuits to drain resources, filing war crimes claims to hinder operations, or shaping narratives to gain international support, and can be employed by state and non-state actors.
Key Aspects of Lawfare:
Strategic Weaponization: Using legal processes (litigation, international courts, regulations) to gain an edge, similar to kinetic warfare but with legal tools.
Delegitimization: Aiming to portray an adversary's actions as illegal or illegitimate, eroding their support.
Resource Drain: Wasting an opponent's time, money, and energy through prolonged legal battles (e.g., SLAPP suits, strategic litigation).
Operational Constraints: Creating legal dilemmas or constraints that limit an adversary's freedom of action, especially in counter-terrorism or conflict zones.
Broad Application: Extends beyond military conflict to influence foreign policy, media, domestic politics, and civil society.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:36 am to Lsupimp
quote:
You asked for a definition. I gave you a literal one without any bullshite
Yes and I began testing it and you immediately quit because, I imagine, your definition included things you don't consider lawfare.
The logical next step is to refine the definition to lead to less absurd results. You chose the ad hom option, instead, as most do.
quote:
You chose to deflect away from answering the question you posed .
Not at all. The point of "lawfare" being impossible to define is my point. I showed that in real time, as I have countless other times before.
My comment (it wasn't a question, technically) is only one step in the process of proving my point. It was not the final step.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:37 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
filing and weaponizing lawsuits against a political enemy.
So none of the prosecutions against Trump are lawfare?
The lawsuits against the Biden admin for the Covid mandate and student loan forgiveness plans were lawfare?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
One of the biggest pathological liars on this board
That is awfully rich, coming from you, RogertheCucker.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:41 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
That is awfully rich, coming from you, RogertheCucker.
Good example of a pathological liar lying.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So none of the prosecutions against Trump are lawfare?
You are so disingenuous and completely ravaged by TDS. Literally all the lawsuits against Trump were lawfare. But you keep simping for Democrats and crying about OMB. Don't go changing now...
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
To skip a few steps in the process, I'll give y'all a concept that you need to focus on when conceptualizing this before you respond. The crucial issue with the term lawfare, and more importantly how it's used in political discourse, is legitimacy. The term is used to criticize actions that are not seen as legitimate. The problem is that a lot of these actions are legitimate and have been used by your political in group for ways that you see as legitimate. This is typically the variable that causes the most complications when defining the term.
I just give you this so that we can save some time and let you wrap your head around that concept before you really respond further
I just give you this so that we can save some time and let you wrap your head around that concept before you really respond further
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:43 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Literally all the lawsuits against Trump were lawfare
Prosecutions are not lawsuits.
My comment was based on your words as an attempt to let you think "maybe I didn't use the right words"
quote:
But you keep simping for Democrats
It's curious that you say this while ignoring the other questions I asked you because I believe the lawsuits against the Biden student loan program and the covid mandate were both legitimate and good and they were very critical of Democrats. I don't consider those to be lawfare but they fall within your definition as lawfare so technically you're the one defending the Democrats with the definition you gave
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Slowactuallypro, lawfare doesn't exist!
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News