Started By
Message

re: Pentagon blames Afghan army in closed House briefing: 'You can't buy willpower'

Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56552 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:22 pm to
Gee, it only took 20 years to figure it out

you don't leave behind billions in Military equipment....to the taliban

thats on the admin
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Your issue is with a very short-sighted Secretary of Defense who was a micro-manager to the nth degree. It did in fact produce serious shortfalls in subsequent rotations (which he helped to create). That does not speak to your disparagement of the National Guard in your initial post. If you understood the Total Force (something few Active Component officers do) then you can see how they were poised to contribute to the fight but were frittered away (as was all Reserve Component strength at that time).



I never spoke disparagingly toward any individual NG Soldier. I spoke about them conducting a mission that they were not train to conduct. It was done by the Leadership at NGB and the Pentagon. They were poised to contribute to the fight in other capacities. But the Pentagon did not trust the NG to work above the Battalion level to contribute to this fight until 2007. The line you always heard was the GAARNG Armor unit from the first Gulf War. Again, this was a case of NGB wanting to get its Sr Officers into the fight, so they pushed for this mission. Just stating the facts. It also showed how much of a emphasis the Pentagon placed on training the ANA.

Never answered the question on the Taliban in 2004. We knew from the beginning that we were not going to create a Western style Army, but many third world countries have a security force that can protect it interest. The argument about the Afghans being tribal in nature and unable to progress is the same we have heard about Arab Countries for years. It is short-sighted and is part of the ignorance of American Policy over the years. You think the woman of Afghanistan want to return to Taliban rule ?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81611 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

The argument about the Afghans being tribal in nature and unable to progress is the same we have heard about Arab Countries for years. It is short-sighted and is part of the ignorance of American Policy over the years. You think the woman of Afghanistan want to return to Taliban rule ?


Afghanistan isn't an Arab country. Arab countries have a literacy rate between 70-90%. Afghanistan under the Taliban had a literacy rate of 25%. When so few can read and write, they rely on their tribal and spiritual leadership.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Afghanistan isn't an Arab country. Arab countries have a literacy rate between 70-90%. Afghanistan under the Taliban had a literacy rate of 25%. When so few can read and write, they rely on their tribal and spiritual leadership.



True, but they use the same policy approach to both. p.s I am Arab-American.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115462 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:49 pm to
The fact that Miley has 4 stars is ridiculous.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26513 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:52 pm to
Milley and Austin oversaw the withdrawal from Afghanistan with the same policies that Biden used at our southern border. There are those who saw this coming.

Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127396 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:12 pm to
We discussed my background. Let’s see your ORB.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

We discussed my background. Let’s see your ORB.



15
This post was edited on 8/16/21 at 1:22 pm
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:21 pm to
More proof of my point: LINK
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127396 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:23 pm to
Rank?

And on a positive note I did CLOAC back in the day.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127396 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

More proof of my point: LINK
Not sure what your point is. We have known for years this was going to happen. They would not stand and fight. The fact that senior leaders refused to acknowledge it hardly proves your point.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:27 pm to
LTC
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127396 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:32 pm to
Fair enough.

The Taliban were inconsequential by the conclusion of 2003. We had done an exceptional job in engaging and defeating them on their ground. We were actually focusing on lesser insurgent groups at that point.

And then we invaded Iraq.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Not sure what your point is. We have known for years this was going to happen. They would not stand and fight. The fact that senior leaders refused to acknowledge it hardly proves your point.



It proves my point that the ANA was ill-trained and it was covered up at the highest level. Mainly because it was sanctioned at the highest level. Not blaming the rank and file, this falls on the leadership. Leadership that has changed face over the years, but was nurtured by the original thinkers and pushed to follow their legacy. The Petraeus Doctrine has really worked out in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Too busy fricking his aide to re-evaluate his theory.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90754 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Not blaming the rank and file
Aren't you the one that shite on the Guard?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127396 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

It proves my point that the ANA was ill-trained and it was covered up at the highest level.
They received adequate training with the resources they had. Not the best, not the worst. The issue is not the training. It is an understanding of national pride or recognition (which they do not have - and there is nothing wrong with that) that produces the necessary cohesiveness in combat. Weapons, ranges and immediate action drills cannot overcome that.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Aren't you the one that shite on the Guard?



No dumbass, I shite on the Leadership of the Guard. There is a difference.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90754 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

No dumbass
Thanks for the clarification cocksucker.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127396 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Aren’t you the one that shite on the Guard?
You make the call.
quote:

The ANA was trained by a patchwork group of American Military (mainly the NG). We were too busy trying to win battles that we didn't think beyond the near term. The NG wanted skin in the game so their middle to Sr Officers could get combat time, because they knew it would be a big part in promotions in the future. They had Aviators and Logistic Officers teaching Security and Infantry tactics. That needs to be explained to the American People.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Thanks for the clarification cocksucker.


Any time.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram