- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pentagon blames Afghan army in closed House briefing: 'You can't buy willpower'
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:22 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:22 pm to cajunangelle
Gee, it only took 20 years to figure it out
you don't leave behind billions in Military equipment....to the taliban
thats on the admin
you don't leave behind billions in Military equipment....to the taliban
thats on the admin
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:35 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Your issue is with a very short-sighted Secretary of Defense who was a micro-manager to the nth degree. It did in fact produce serious shortfalls in subsequent rotations (which he helped to create). That does not speak to your disparagement of the National Guard in your initial post. If you understood the Total Force (something few Active Component officers do) then you can see how they were poised to contribute to the fight but were frittered away (as was all Reserve Component strength at that time).
I never spoke disparagingly toward any individual NG Soldier. I spoke about them conducting a mission that they were not train to conduct. It was done by the Leadership at NGB and the Pentagon. They were poised to contribute to the fight in other capacities. But the Pentagon did not trust the NG to work above the Battalion level to contribute to this fight until 2007. The line you always heard was the GAARNG Armor unit from the first Gulf War. Again, this was a case of NGB wanting to get its Sr Officers into the fight, so they pushed for this mission. Just stating the facts. It also showed how much of a emphasis the Pentagon placed on training the ANA.
Never answered the question on the Taliban in 2004. We knew from the beginning that we were not going to create a Western style Army, but many third world countries have a security force that can protect it interest. The argument about the Afghans being tribal in nature and unable to progress is the same we have heard about Arab Countries for years. It is short-sighted and is part of the ignorance of American Policy over the years. You think the woman of Afghanistan want to return to Taliban rule ?
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:38 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
The argument about the Afghans being tribal in nature and unable to progress is the same we have heard about Arab Countries for years. It is short-sighted and is part of the ignorance of American Policy over the years. You think the woman of Afghanistan want to return to Taliban rule ?
Afghanistan isn't an Arab country. Arab countries have a literacy rate between 70-90%. Afghanistan under the Taliban had a literacy rate of 25%. When so few can read and write, they rely on their tribal and spiritual leadership.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:46 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Afghanistan isn't an Arab country. Arab countries have a literacy rate between 70-90%. Afghanistan under the Taliban had a literacy rate of 25%. When so few can read and write, they rely on their tribal and spiritual leadership.
True, but they use the same policy approach to both. p.s I am Arab-American.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:49 pm to cajunangelle
The fact that Miley has 4 stars is ridiculous.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:52 pm to cajunangelle
Milley and Austin oversaw the withdrawal from Afghanistan with the same policies that Biden used at our southern border. There are those who saw this coming.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:12 pm to Irons Puppet
We discussed my background. Let’s see your ORB.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:16 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
We discussed my background. Let’s see your ORB.
15
This post was edited on 8/16/21 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:21 pm to Wolfhound45
More proof of my point: LINK
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:23 pm to Irons Puppet
Rank?
And on a positive note I did CLOAC back in the day.
And on a positive note I did CLOAC back in the day.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:25 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:Not sure what your point is. We have known for years this was going to happen. They would not stand and fight. The fact that senior leaders refused to acknowledge it hardly proves your point.
More proof of my point: LINK
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:32 pm to Irons Puppet
Fair enough.
The Taliban were inconsequential by the conclusion of 2003. We had done an exceptional job in engaging and defeating them on their ground. We were actually focusing on lesser insurgent groups at that point.
And then we invaded Iraq.
The Taliban were inconsequential by the conclusion of 2003. We had done an exceptional job in engaging and defeating them on their ground. We were actually focusing on lesser insurgent groups at that point.
And then we invaded Iraq.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:33 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Not sure what your point is. We have known for years this was going to happen. They would not stand and fight. The fact that senior leaders refused to acknowledge it hardly proves your point.
It proves my point that the ANA was ill-trained and it was covered up at the highest level. Mainly because it was sanctioned at the highest level. Not blaming the rank and file, this falls on the leadership. Leadership that has changed face over the years, but was nurtured by the original thinkers and pushed to follow their legacy. The Petraeus Doctrine has really worked out in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Too busy fricking his aide to re-evaluate his theory.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:37 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:Aren't you the one that shite on the Guard?
Not blaming the rank and file
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:38 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:They received adequate training with the resources they had. Not the best, not the worst. The issue is not the training. It is an understanding of national pride or recognition (which they do not have - and there is nothing wrong with that) that produces the necessary cohesiveness in combat. Weapons, ranges and immediate action drills cannot overcome that.
It proves my point that the ANA was ill-trained and it was covered up at the highest level.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:39 pm to Jbird
quote:
Aren't you the one that shite on the Guard?
No dumbass, I shite on the Leadership of the Guard. There is a difference.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:39 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:Thanks for the clarification cocksucker.
No dumbass
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:41 pm to Jbird
quote:You make the call.
Aren’t you the one that shite on the Guard?
quote:
The ANA was trained by a patchwork group of American Military (mainly the NG). We were too busy trying to win battles that we didn't think beyond the near term. The NG wanted skin in the game so their middle to Sr Officers could get combat time, because they knew it would be a big part in promotions in the future. They had Aviators and Logistic Officers teaching Security and Infantry tactics. That needs to be explained to the American People.
Posted on 8/16/21 at 1:41 pm to Jbird
quote:
Thanks for the clarification cocksucker.
Any time.
Popular
Back to top


0




