- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paging SFP: superseding indictment in SPLC case.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:13 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:13 pm to AlterEd
What do those posts have to do with the words you quoted? 
Those posts are from prior to the original indictment being filed. Are you arguing I can predict the future?
Or are you throwing irrelevant randomness against the wall?
Those posts are from prior to the original indictment being filed. Are you arguing I can predict the future?
Or are you throwing irrelevant randomness against the wall?
1
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:14 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
trying to condone this.
The law enforcement, including the DOJ, who took this information to u se already condoned it
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What do those posts have to do with the words you quoted?
Are you frickin stupid (rhetorical question obviously)? Those posts show you weren't simply talking about what is in the indictment. That you were laughing at the idea that these people were paid to conduct operations. And that was wrong. You spent more than 20 frickin pages insisting they were simply paying "snitches" and that these salacious allegations will be easily defeated in court.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
"a bit"
Slo
"just a bit dead"
lol
Slo
"just a bit dead"
lol
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:17 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Those posts show you weren't simply talking about what is in the indictment.
Look at the date on those posts.
Look up when the indictment was filed.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:17 pm to scrooster
quote:
You would think that not even the demoncrats are going to be able to run cover for that level of fraud and corruption.
I'm hoping similar hammers fall on BLM & the NAACP. You know the same kind of astroturfed nonsense is going on there, too. Generating their own opposing force to justify their existence is job #1.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:18 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
No chance. He’ll double down and gaslight the board for eternity
Right. I realized my error right away. Narcissists like this guy can't admit error. They're incapable of it. And it isn't even a big deal being dead wrong like he constantly is. What is noteworthy is his inability to ever acknowledge it. It's amazing.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:19 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Narcissists like this guy can't admit error.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Muh statute of limitations!
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
I believe I told you there would be superseding indictments on the original SFPLC thread.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
trying to condone this.
The law enforcement, including the DOJ, who took this information to u se already condoned it
Which DOJ??? Not the DOJ Trump installed in '24. You must be referring to the Biden DOJ which supported any and all progressive Marxist Dems frickery.
Of course whichever local law enforcement would defer to the federal law enforcement authority, which did zero.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nothing really has changed, from what I can see.
Take off the hood the SPLC gave you and maybe you could see
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would I when my comments were about the indictment language itself?
Pathetic
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:30 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I'm hoping similar hammers fall on BLM & the NAACP. You know the same kind of astroturfed nonsense is going on there, too. Generating their own opposing force to justify their existence is job #1.
It's entirely reasonable to believe similar investigations are ongoing....
I've said before, after mid terms(Republicans will do fine), I think we'll see much more action.....
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:32 pm to VoxDawg
My guess is the the SPLC was part of the funding for BLM. Hopefully the DOJ is able to trace all the money in and out, including the funds that went directly to SPLC Caymen accounts.
This was a huge red flag when the SPLC announced they moved their bank accounts to the Caymens. Why would an honorable organization feel they needed to do that? A. To hide their funding sources. B. To avoid US CTR requirements. C. To hide who they really reported to and who was pulling money out?
This was a huge red flag when the SPLC announced they moved their bank accounts to the Caymens. Why would an honorable organization feel they needed to do that? A. To hide their funding sources. B. To avoid US CTR requirements. C. To hide who they really reported to and who was pulling money out?
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:33 pm to Rebel
quote:
I believe I told you there would be superseding indictments on the original SFPLC thread.
These don't really add much, though. Nothing of real substance form what I can see, in the actual allegations/facts.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:34 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
I've said before, after mid terms(Republicans will do fine), I think we'll see much more action.....
Agreed. There are some key RINOs who have already been removed from the board via the primary process. It's unreasonable to suspect that they'll do anything but obstruct for the next 7 months, so all of the good stuff will have to happen with the 120th Congress.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:34 pm to Rebel
quote:
I believe I told you there would be superseding indictments on the original SFPLC thread
This will all be easily disproven. The fraud and whatever else. SFPLC has guaranteed it. I even tried to get him to clarify that they will catch a single misdemeanor charge and he even said they'll skate on that too.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what I can see
Well you’re biased so that means jack shite.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:34 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Which DOJ??? Not the DOJ Trump installed in '24.
Maybe, but it does include the Trump DOJ 2017-2020
quote:
Of course whichever local law enforcement would defer to the federal law enforcement authority,
Not what I said
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News