- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:32 am to texridder
quote:
As usual, you are FOS. The article also talked about the total number of registered voters. The page in the article is from the same website I posted. The only thing that is irrelevant here is you.
Ok. And how does talking about the total number of registered voters in the county change the point of the article that one precinct showed 120% turnout?
That is the title of the article. That is the title of the OP. ONE Precinct showed 120% turnout. You respond by posting numbers for the entire county.
What relevance does the total number of voters in a county have to the results from one specific precinct? Explain the relevance, please.
You “argument”, like always, is not relevant and nonsensical. Your mind is fascinating.
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 5:06 am
Posted on 12/4/18 at 5:16 am to texridder
quote:
71% of registered voters cast their vote.
That's pretty damn high for a midterm election.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 5:30 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Ok. And how does talking about the total number of registered voters in the county change the point of the article that one precinct showed 120% turnout?
That is the title of the article. That is the title of the OP. ONE Precinct showed 120% turnout. You respond by posting numbers for the entire county
One precinct was not the point of the article. How significant is it that one precinct in a county sopposedly had 120% turnout?
The weighted point made was the voter turnout and the percentage of democrat and republican registered voters voted.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 5:34 am to texridder
quote:
One precinct was not the point of the article.
quote:
Orange County Releases Official Vote Count and the Numbers Don’t Add Up – One Precinct Has 120% Turnout
Spot on, as usual. This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 5:36 am
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:07 am to Jjdoc
So now the Democrats represent literally no one.
So having gained the broad support of the elusive mail-in and provisional voters, is there any further need to pander to the would-be migrant voters?
So having gained the broad support of the elusive mail-in and provisional voters, is there any further need to pander to the would-be migrant voters?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:19 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
It’s a turnout of less than 70% of the 1.56 million voters. There would have had to have been 789 thousand more votes, 73% more than turned out, for it to have had a 120% turnout. I have no idea why that person would even say 120% when the voter registration totals are right there.
Yeah - you saved me the effort of posting this.
The OP is completely screwed up - this kind of shite should be banned.
If you post some lie in a headline and then post the data that proves it's a lie - shouldn't that be treated as 'trolling the board' or something.
This kind of shite pisses me off.
And I am one of those who believe that there is massive voter fraud going on in heavily DEMOCRAT precincts - have been since 1960. This kind of crap just gives everyone a reason to ignore other data.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:31 am to ChineseBandit58
Re-read the OP Bandit. It is referring to one precinct being at 120%.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:38 am to texridder
quote:
One precinct was not the point of the article. How significant is it that one precinct in a county sopposedly had 120% turnout?
Both the title of the thread and the linked article speak of the a precinct that had a turnout of 120%, you responded, lied and got caught.
Sometimes you need to admit an error to avoid appearing stupid, this is one of those times.
Bottom line, Democrats cannot win without cheating and California is a hotbed.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:42 am to Jjdoc
There MUST be prosecutions
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:54 am to Jyrdis
quote:
Now, is it strange that Republicans seemingly won their races election night only to actually lose them weeks later. Sure, but that’s a different discussion.
And this only seems to happen to Republicans - even stranger.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:01 am to buckeye_vol
quote:This post should have ended the thread. Don’t know why folks are still debating this.
I don’t understand this point when 494 thousand of the 1.56 million registered voters (31.7%) are not registered as R or D. So taking the R and D registration statistics and comparing them to the vote totals of the R and D candidates and completely ignoring the other third of the registered voters doesn’t make sense.
Also, how has OP not been banned yet?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:04 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Re-read
I studied it closely prior to my post - and then re-read as per your suggestion.
I still don't see the correlation to the OP. Looks like about 2/3 of the registered voters turned out not 6/5 as the OP states.
I am confident the illegal vote in California, Chicago, NYC, Philly, etc is out of control. I also fear that easily disproved OPs like this are not helpful.
Perhaps I just don't understand the numbers presented in the insert the OP posted. ????????
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:04 am to Jjdoc
They aren't even trying to hide the fraud anymore because they know that no one will hold them accountable. Third world tactics by a third world party.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:05 am to Jjdoc
The voter fraud these midterms was shocking.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:07 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
And this only seems to happen to Republicans - even stranger.
This should almost require the establishment of a CIVIL RIGHTS task force. Something like "Disparate Impact" ought to fit the bill.
Just imagine what would happen if this kind of data showed that black or female voters were similarly shown to have been 'impacted' by some identifiable result.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:11 am to Boatshoes
quote:
They aren't even trying to hide the fraud anymore because they know that no one will hold them accountable. Third world tactics by a third world party.
In North Carolina? No kidding right?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:11 am to texridder
quote:
How significant is it that one precinct in a county sopposedly had 120% turnout?
Very, it is evidence of organized cheating with official support.
You can't get 120% without official help from within the administration that runs the elections.
To assume this happened in only one precinct or is benign is assinine.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:54 am to Revelator
Corruption is the new standard of behavior.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:57 am to Jjdoc
Democrats be like “Whatever it takes.”
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News