- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT reporter who printed Officer Wilson's address doesn't like turnabout.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:17 pm to bhtigerfan
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:17 pm to bhtigerfan
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 8:18 pm
1
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:19 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:bullshite. You are a complete pussy. All talk
Now if I came across him, he'd most likely get an arse whoopin.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:20 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:One of the smartest posts your Cheetos eating arse has ever produced.
(No message)
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:23 pm to Sentrius
quote:yeah. Except they didn't publish his address. So there's that.
Moron, I was speaking to your implied claim that if something is legal like posting someone's address for any reason whatsoever, its morally ok to do.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:23 pm to Jbird
quote:so original
One of the smartest posts your Cheetos eating arse has ever produced
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:25 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:So boring.
so original
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:43 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Now if I came across him, he'd most likely get an arse whoopin
Sure tough guy, sure.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:12 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Except they didn't publish his address. So there's that.
You're such a smug a-hole, they could say he lives in the third house on the left , or the house immediately after 201 Main Street and you'd still be arguing that it's all ok because they didn't report his address
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:15 pm to fleaux
quote:
they could say he lives in the third house on the left ,
They didn't.
quote:
or the house immediately after 201 Main Street
They didn't
Do you have any reality based arguments to make?
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 12/1/14 at 11:42 pm to fleaux
quote:
You're such a smug a-hole, they could say he lives in the third house on the left , or the house immediately after 201 Main Street and you'd still be arguing that it's all ok because they didn't report his address
The Times removed a picture of his wedding license for fear that it did show his address. Turns out that it didn't. But they still removed it. Why?
Posted on 12/1/14 at 11:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
The Times removed a picture of his wedding license for fear that it did show his address. Turns out that it didn't. But they still removed it. Why?
It was the address of a law firm. I imagine they gave the Times a call.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 11:56 pm to SpidermanTUba
Posted on 12/1/14 at 11:58 pm to SpidermanTUba
The law firm is public record. Why would the Times remove it?
Posted on 12/1/14 at 11:58 pm to Paluka
quote:
Along with the content of the article, the paper included a picture of Wilson and Spradling's marriage license. While the image included an address, that address was not the Crestwood house formerly occupied by the couple; it was the address of a law firm in nearby Clayton, Missouri.
Read more at LINK
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 11:59 pm
Posted on 12/2/14 at 12:02 am to the808bass
quote:
The law firm is public record. Why would the Times remove it?
Probably the law firm didn't want to be harassed by illiterates who mistakenly believed it was Wilson's home address, and they gave the Times a call. Or the Times lawyers suggested it should be removed before the law firm in question gave them a call.
Posted on 12/2/14 at 12:04 am to SpidermanTUba
Welp without saying any more, Times may be fricked. They removed the picture for a reason. That will probably come out eventually. Sometime after the settlement, I'd guess.
Posted on 12/2/14 at 12:05 am to the808bass
quote:
Welp without saying any more, Times may be fricked. They removed the picture for a reason. That will probably come out eventually. Sometime after the settlement, I'd guess.
What picture?
Posted on 12/2/14 at 12:05 am to SpidermanTUba
Of the marriage license.
Posted on 12/2/14 at 12:11 am to the808bass
quote:
Of the marriage license.
What else would a marriage license contain?
Names of witnesses to the license, and the name of the officiant. It would be irresponsible to publish those names and associate them with Wilson if they aren't already widely known to the public. The best man's signature, for instance, may be on it - and if he isn't already widely known to be an associate of Wilson's, that would make it known.
Its either that or the law firms address was a problem and they decided to just yank the entire license.
Obviously the Times already knew the address on it wasn't Wilson's because they published the name of his street.
This post was edited on 12/2/14 at 12:13 am
Posted on 12/2/14 at 12:12 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Officer Wilson and Officer Spradling own a home together on Manda Lane in Crestwood, Mo., a St. Louis suburb about a half-hour drive from Ferguson.
LINK
This is what they wrote. You are really ok with this?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News