Started By
Message

re: "Nobody needs an AR-15 to defend themselves!"

Posted on 3/23/21 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
54948 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

AR-15’s are M-4’s.




Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18921 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 1:59 pm to
I don't think there's a mag in that soldiers rifle... He might have it tucked hard into his FLC but I really doubt it.
This post was edited on 3/23/21 at 2:00 pm
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

So exactly HOW MANY times have you been in a firefight with a semiauto against full autos?



Quit pole vaulting over mouseturds you sniveling NERD.

Also, "full auto" is a 3 round burst on the Military issued M4s.

Where in THE frick did I suggest having been in a fricking firefight against "full autos" anyway?

Eat a bag of dicks, sniffledick.
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

MILSPEC is more of a dimensional specification to ensure uniformity.




I know you know your shite, probably better than I do.

I UNDERSTAND MILSPEC. For the purposes of this thread with a lot of posters on here, they don't.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
55203 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:03 pm to
To be fair, non of them have a magazine in the rifle, so they're useless.
Posted by Chazreinhold
Utah
Member since Oct 2020
7243 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:03 pm to
How bout a SCAR 17 with a EOTech holographic sight?

Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

How bout a SCAR 17 with a EOTech holographic sight?



That's what the Germans used when they bombed Pearl Harbor!!
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15020 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:06 pm to
It is exactly what you quote that makes the biggest difference in close range combat.

If you're so but hurt by me pointing out your shortcomings I'll meet you to discuss it.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32990 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

So exactly HOW MANY times have you been in a firefight with a semiauto against full autos?
Um, never. But if we’re a couple hundred yards apart and they’re doing the “spray and pray” full-auto against my semi-auto with good magnified optics, I like my chances.
This post was edited on 3/23/21 at 2:09 pm
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

but hurt


"butt" hurt is the correct spelling, buttfrick.

quote:

pointing out your shortcomings


If you see my post as a "shortcoming" then you are truly pathetic. You are OBVIOUSLY in NO position to point out my shortcomings as you look UP to me.
This post was edited on 3/23/21 at 2:11 pm
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
55203 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

if we’re a couple thousand yards apart

Then get yourself a 300 Norma or 338 Lapua and do your work.
Posted by lsuoilengr
Member since Aug 2008
5347 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:10 pm to
Shall not be infringed. Listen here Joe, you won’t get my guns, you won’t get my magazines. I will not comply with the federal government trying to infringe upon my GOD GIVEN right to protect myself
Posted by ChuckO1975
Member since Feb 2021
1292 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

It is exactly what you quote that makes the biggest difference in close range combat.


Is this what you learned in Call of Doody?

Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15020 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Um, never. But if we’re a couple hundred yards apart and they’re doing the “spray and pray” full-auto against my semi-auto with good optics, I like my chances


Make everything the same. Marksmanship, optics etc. except you get three hits to the torso and your opponent gets one. Now consider the projectiles that you can legally purchase versus the ones the cops/FBI/Military will use to defeat armor.

Still like your chances?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71289 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Those are trained soldiers of the military

And if we know anything about trained soldiers it's that they have fewer mental health issues than most Americans
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15020 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:13 pm to
11 Bravo here.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71289 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

ETA: People who want to ban them seem to say the AR-15 is a weapon of war. As far as I know it isn't. Is there a single military in America that outfits its soldiers with AR-15s?

people just see an AR-15 and think it looks scary so that equates to it being a weapon no one should have.
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Those are M4s. They would cut through a group of people with ARs pretty quickly.

Depends on how the ARs were equipped and deployed.

This post was edited on 3/23/21 at 2:27 pm
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

11 Bravo here


Oh, look everybody, a fricking Clint Romesha wannabe!!!

I've seen and worked with many fantastic 11 bang bangs in my time. I've also seen douche bag 11 Bravos that need to be chaptered out. Which one are you???????
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28147 posts
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Of course the AR15 is a weapon of war.


Name one military conflict that an AR-15 has been used.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram